Posts Tagged ‘Species.’

California Protects Vanishing High Sierra and Southern California Frogs Under State Endangered Species Act

SaCRAMENTO, Calif.The California Fish and Game Commission voted unanimously today to designate two species of native frogs inhabiting high-elevation lakes in the Sierra Nevada and Southern California mountain ranges as threatened and endangered species under the state’s Endangered Species Act. More than 75 percent of the state’s high-elevation frog populations have disappeared because of introductions of nonnative trout, disease and pesticides. Sierra mountain yellow-legged frogs are now protected as threatened species and Southern mountain yellow-legged frogs are designated as endangered.


“With formal state protection, California can start recovering an important part of mountain ecosystems to bring back formerly abundant amphibians,” said Jeff Miller at the Center for Biological Diversity, which petitioned for state protection in 2010. “Taking out exotic trout and getting rid of pollutants to restore mountain yellow-legged frogs will have ripple effects beyond these species — it’ll help to heal some of the damaged high-elevation habitats of the Sierras and Southern California mountains.”


Following the Center’s petition, in 2011 the state’s Department of Fish and Game completed an evaluation of the status of both species and recommended threatened and endangered listings, respectively, for Sierra and southern frogs.


The Center originally petitioned to protect the Sierra frog population under the federal Endangered Species Act in 2000. Mountain yellow-legged frogs in Southern California were protected as a federal endangered species in 2002, but although the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service determined Sierra frogs also deserved endangered status, it instead placed them on an indefinite waiting list. A recent settlement agreement with the Center, which will also speed protection decisions for 756 other species, requires the Service in 2013 to make a decision about whether to add the Sierra frog to the federal endangered list.


A few decades ago, mountain yellow-legged frogs were abundant around many of the Sierra’s alpine lakes. Tadpoles must survive up to four freezing winters at the bottom of deep lakes before metamorphosing. These hardy frogs are vulnerable to predation by introduced trout and diseases possibly exacerbated by pesticides; other threats are habitat changes caused by water developments, climate change and livestock grazing. More than half of frog populations found in 1995 have gone extinct.


The new state listing makes it unlawful to “take” (kill, harm or capture) frogs without authorization. The Center has twice sued the California Department of Fish and Game to force evaluation of the environmental impacts of the state’s fish-stocking program, which introduces exotic trout into the high-elevation habitats where species such as the mountain-yellow-legged frog evolved without aquatic predators. The Department is recommending no trout stocking in the state without a fish management plan, and no further stocking in areas that would conflict with protecting yellow-legged frogs.


Background

The mountain yellow-legged frog was recently redescribed by scientists as two distinct species: the southern mountain-yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa), in the southern Sierra and Southern California mountain ranges; and the Sierra Nevada mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana sierrae), inhabiting the central and northern Sierra.


Widespread stocking of nonnative trout in high-elevation Sierra lakes has been a primary cause of the species’ decline: Introduced trout eat tadpoles and juvenile frogs.

Recent research has also linked pesticides that drift from agricultural areas in the Central Valley to declines of Sierra Nevada amphibians; pesticides and other pollutants can kill frogs or make them more susceptible to disease. Mismanagement of national forest lands has degraded habitat, while climate change has brought warmer temperatures, decreases in runoff and other changes rendering frog populations vulnerable to drought-related extinction events.

Read more about the Center’s 757 species settlement here:

http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/biodiversity/species_agreement/index.html

and our campaign to save mountain yellow-legged frogs here: http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/amphibians/Sierra_Nevada_mountain_yellow-legged_frog/index.html

Contact Info: Jeff Miller, (415) 669-7357

Website : Center for Biological Diversity

Full content generated by Get Full RSS.
ENN Network News – ENN

New species discovered in Suriname


A scientific expedition into one of the world’s last pristine tropical forests has revealed incredibly diverse species and extraordinary cultural heritage, say Conservation International. Their survey in south-west Suriname has documented nearly 1,300 species, including 46 that may be new to science

Photograph: Trond Larsen/Conservation International

Full content generated by Get Full RSS.
Environment news, comment and analysis from the Guardian | guardian.co.uk

Dunes Sagebrush Lizard Named One of 10 U.S. Species Most Threatened by Fossil Fuel Development

MIDLAND, Texas— The dunes sagebrush lizard, a small, rare lizard that lives only in Texas and New Mexico, was named one of 10 U.S. species most urgently threatened by fossil fuel development in a report released Thursday by the Endangered Species Coalition. The report, called Fueling Extinction: How Dirty Energy Drives Wildlife to the Brink, highlights the top 10 U.S. species whose survival is most threatened by fossil fuels. The dunes sagebrush lizard is currently proposed for protection under the Endangered Species Act. 


“America’s outsized reliance on dirty and dangerous fuels is making it much harder to protect our most vulnerable wildlife,” said Mark Salvo with WildEarth Guardians. “We should not sacrifice our irreplaceable natural heritage in order to make the fossil fuels industry even wealthier.”


The report highlights the 10 most endangered animals, plants, birds and fish at risk of extinction due to fossil fuel development, and shows how wildlife suffers displacement, loss of habitat and the threat of extinction from the development, storage and transportation of fossil fuels. Coalition members nominated candidates for inclusion in the report; submissions were then reviewed, judged and voted on by a panel of scientists. The report identifies the home range, conservation status, remaining population and specific threat facing each of the 10 finalists.


The dunes sagebrush lizard occurs in slivers of shinnery oak-sand dune habitat within the Permian Basin, the largest onshore oil and gas field in the United States. The Center for Biological Diversity petitioned the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to protect the lizard under the Endangered Species Act in 2002, and WildEarth Guardians submitted an emergency petition for the species in 2008. Long threatened by fossil fuel development and other land uses, the species was finally proposed for an endangered listing by the Service in December 2010. 


“The fact that dunes sagebrush lizard habitat spans less than 2 percent of the Permian Basin hasn’t stopped oil-polluted politicians from claiming that protecting the lizard will destroy industry,” said Taylor McKinnon with the Center for Biological Diversity. “The lizard, not the oil and gas industry, is at risk of extinction — and industry’s refusal to yield even the last tiny slivers of habitat to prevent that extinction underscores the need for federal protections.”


Congressional opponents have loudly proclaimed that listing will “shut down” oil and gas development in the Permian Basin. Rep. Steve Pearce (R-N.M.) and colleagues have tried every conceivable tactic to prevent the Service from protecting the species. Pearce’s opposition to listing the lizard is without basis, however, as the dunes sagebrush lizard occurs on less than 2 percent of the Permian Basin, and its small range has already been drilled with thousands of oil and gas wells. The Service has repeatedly stated that listing the lizard will have negligible effects on oil and gas development — but Pearce and his colleagues are undeterred. He and other members of Congress recently pressured the agency to delay the final listing decision for six months, allowing opponents more time to sharpen their attacks on this tiny reptile.


Fueling Extinction: How Dirty Energy Drives Wildlife to the Brink calls for a commitment to a clean, safe and sustainable energy future; it urges lawmakers to honor the intent of the Endangered Species Act while reducing the country’s dependence on dirty fossil fuels.


For more information and to see the full report, go to: http://fuelingextinction.org.

Contact Info: Taylor McKinnon, Center for Biological Diversity, (928) 310-6713

Mark Salvo, WildEarth Guardians, (503) 757-4221

Website : Center for Biological Diversity

Full content generated by Get Full RSS.
ENN Network News – ENN

Lawsuit Seeks Endangered Species Act Protection for Alabama Shad

WASHINGTON— The Center for Biological Diversity filed a lawsuit against the National Marine Fisheries Service Wednesday over its denial of Endangered Species Act protection to the Alabama shad. The shad was once so abundant that it supported commercial fisheries in Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Indiana and Iowa, but because of a combination of dams, pollution and habitat destruction is now rarely found in most of its former range.


“There’s no question the Alabama shad has suffered dramatic declines and needs Endangered Species Act protection to survive,” said Tierra Curry, conservation biologist with the Center. “The Endangered Species Act has a 99 percent success rate at saving species from extinction, but before the law can pull an animal back from the brink, the species has to be given threatened or endangered status. The shad should be granted that status.”


The Alabama shad once occurred in rivers from Florida to Oklahoma, but today only a handful of populations survives. The shad’s decline is typical of many freshwater animals in the Southeast, where longstanding abuse and neglect of the region’s waterways have led to the imperilment of hundreds of species in what is widely recognized as a region of unparalleled freshwater biodiversity.


In 2010 the Center petitioned for Endangered Species Act protection for 404 species dependent on southeastern rivers and streams, including the shad. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recently issued a positive initial finding on 374 of these species, meaning they will all get a status review to determine if protection is warranted. For the shad, however, the National Marine Fisheries Service rejected protection even before a status review was conducted.


“The Fisheries Service has recognized threats to the shad since at least 1997, yet refused to even conduct a formal status review of the rare fish,” said Curry. “Endangered Species Act protection for the shad could restore a commercial fishery and help restore the region’s rivers — which would benefit people as well as the shad.”


The shad was recognized as a candidate for protection by the Fisheries Service in 1997. It was switched to a “species of concern” in 2004, at which time the Fisheries Service said it would conduct a status review, which has yet to occur.


Alabama shad spend most of their six-year life in the ocean, returning to freshwater rivers to breed. Juvenile shad remain in fresh water for the first six to eight months of their lives, feeding on small fishes and invertebrates. Populations of the shad are thought to remain in the Apalachicola River, Fla.; the Choctawhatchee and Conecuh rivers, Ala.; the Pascagoula River, Miss.; the Ouachita River, Ark.; and the Missouri, Gasconade, Osage and Meramec rivers, Mo.


Learn more about our campaign to stop the Southeast freshwater extinction crisis here: http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/biodiversity/1000_species/the_southeast_freshwater_extinction_crisis/index.html

Contact Info: Tierra Curry, (928) 522-3681

Website : Center for Biological Diversity

Full content generated by Get Full RSS.
ENN Network News – ENN

New Rule Bans Import of Four Constrictor Snake Species

Bethesda, MD: At the urging of numerous members of Congress and conservation groups, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) issued a final rule yesterday listing four species of large, non-native constrictor snakes as “injurious” under the Lacey Act. Species listed include the Burmese python, yellow anaconda, northern African rock python, and southern African rock python. The listing gives the FWS authority to ban the importation and interstate transportation of these snakes, which are known to disrupt native ecosystems and prey upon native, imperiled species of wildlife across the U.S.


South Florida has been hardest hit by this invasion, where numerous threatened and endangered species are being predated upon by these invasive snakes. Additionally, these snakes—which can grow to over 20 feet in length and weigh over 100 pounds—can pose a threat to humans. To date, there are accounts of captive snakes fleeing their cages and injuring, sometimes even killing, children and adults.


“In addition to their devastating ecological impacts, these species pose a significant financial burden to taxpayers,” says Michael Hutchins, Executive Director/CEO of TWS. “By listing these as injurious species, we can begin to tackle the problem from the source.” Eradication of these snakes after they make an established presence in an ecosystem is extremely difficult. It is crucial that preventative measures be taken to ensure that the havoc caused by invasive snakes in south Florida is not repeated elsewhere.


While the action taken by the administration is encouraging, TWS strongly supports the FWS recommendation that an additional five species of invasive snake be listed, bringing the total to nine. New additions would include the reticulated python, Beni or Bolivian python, green anaconda, DeSchauensee’s anaconda, and boa constrictor. TWS recommends that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) list these five additional non-native large constrictor snakes as soon as possible. A coordinated federal approach to stopping the source importation of all above mentioned dangerous snake species is the most effective way to minimize future disruptions to local wild and human populations.



Founded in 1937, The Wildlife Society is a non-profit scientific and educational association of over 10,000 professional wildlife biologists and managers, dedicated to excellence in wildlife stewardship through science and education. Our mission is to represent and serve the professional community of scientists, managers, educators, technicians, planners, and others who work actively to study, manage, and conserve wildlife and its habitats worldwide.


Contact Info: Terra Rentz, 301-897-9770, [email protected]

Website : The Wildlife Society

Full content generated by Get Full RSS.
ENN Network News – ENN

Pale octopus, hairy crab and other new species

Pale octopus found in the Southern Ocean
A pale octopus found in the Southern Ocean, near Antarctica. Photograph: Oxford University/PA

A world of previously unseen creatures has been found thriving next to boiling vents of water, several miles under the surface of the Southern Ocean near Antarctica. Hundreds of hairy-chested yeti crabs, a mysterious-looking pale octopus and colonies of limpets, snails and barnacles were found by British scientists at a hydrothermal vent located in the ocean’s East Scotia Ridge.

Prof Alex Rogers of Oxford University used a remotely operated vehicle called Isis to scout the sea bed around the ridge, which spans about 2.4km and features springs of black, smoky water that can reach temperatures of almost 400C (752F). The hydrothermal vents are powered by underwater volcanoes, and the scalding temperatures and rich mineral content of the water gives rise to vast rocky chimneys that support a wide variety of life forms.


Marine life found miles underwater in the Southern Ocean, near Antarctica
An image of some of the thriving life found beneath the Southern Ocean. Photograph: Oxford University/PA

“The visually dominant species are the yeti crabs, which occur in fantastically high densities, up to 600 per square metre around the southern ridge,” said Rogers, who led the expedition aboard the RSS James Cook in January 2010. “Also high densities of stalked barnacles, a large snail from a group called the peltospiroids, and we’ve also got small, green limpets which occur all over the vents.”

The first-known yeti crab, Kiwa hirsuta, was described living near a hydrothermal vent in the south pacific in 2005 and, since then, several species have been discovered in different parts of the undersea world. Around other hydrothermal vents, however, these creatures tend occur in lower numbers; and the new species found in the ESR are not only more numerous but also visually distinct.

“Hirsuta has long hairs on its limbs and its claws, whereas our yeti crabs have extremely hairy chests. One of the nicknames of the crabs which developed during the cruise was the Hasselhoff crabs because they had these dense mats of [hair] on their undersides, the equivalents of their chests.”

Another striking creature spotted by the scientists was a pale octopus, which was photographed by the team. Rogers suspected it might be a new species related to the Vulcanoctopus hydrothermalis seen at other underwater vents around the world.

In total, the expedition brought back more than 12,000 samples of rocks, bacteria and animals. Rogers said: “One of the staggering things we did find is that these vents are completely different to those seen anywhere else – the animals existing at these vents are almost all new to science,” he said. The findings were published on Tuesday in the journal PLoS Biology.

“What we didn’t find is almost as surprising as what we did,” said Rogers. “Many animals such as tubeworms, vent mussels, vent crabs, and vent shrimps, which are found in hydrothermal vents in the Pacific, Atlantic, and Indian Oceans, simply weren’t there.”

Last week, scientists at the University of Southampton announced the discovery of new creatures in the so-called “Dragon Vent” in the south-west Indian Ocean.

Dr Jon Copley, a marine biologist at the University of Southampton who led the exploration of the Dragon Vent and is also an author on the latest PLoS Biology research paper, said that exploration of the world’s deep-sea vents was a race against time.

“The exploitation of the deep ocean is overtaking its exploration. We’re fishing in deeper and deeper waters, oil and gas is moving into deeper waters and now there’s mining starting to take place in deep waters. We need to understand how species disperse and evolve in the deep oceans if we’re going to make responsible decisions about managing their resources.”

Rogers added that the vents revealed much about how deep water communities have evolved, and how they are distributed across the world’s oceans. “In the space of a single eight-week cruise, we’ve changed our level of understanding of these systems completely. We’ve changed our ideas about how vent systems are distributed and the factors that may influence that distribution. What that tells us is that our level of knowledge of the deep sea in general is extremely poor indeed.”

He added that hydrothermal vents had already changed the way scientists thought about how life exists on earth. “They told scientists that life could exist in the absence of sunlight – you could have food webs based on mechanical energy. They were also informative about the extreme conditions under which life could exist, they told us about where else in the universe life may occur. Hydrothermal vent biology has stimulated a whole new science of astrobiology.”






Full content generated by Get Full RSS.
Environment news, comment and analysis from the Guardian | guardian.co.uk

Defra: £1.3 million government pledge to protect our most endangered species

£1.3 million is being invested in a range of projects dedicated to protecting some of the world’s most endangered and best-loved species, Environment Minister Richard Benyon announced today.

From supporting efforts to stamp out the barbaric trade in rhino horn to preserving habitats for fast-disappearing wild tigers, this new fund cements the UK’s commitment to leading the way in international conservation.

Environment Minister Richard Benyon said:

“Global action must be taken before these species are wiped out for good. Tigers, rhinos, elephants and apes are much loved animals that some of us take for granted. Yet many are suffering horrific deaths at the hands of poachers and traffickers or because their habitats are being destroyed. 

“It would be a travesty if these animals were allowed to disappear forever, which is why the UK Government is committed to leading the way in supporting such vital international conservation.

“We need to stop these animals disappearing forever and the projects receiving funding today are working to do just that, which is why I am so pleased to be able to support them.”

Defra has consistently supported efforts to protect tigers and rhinos in the wild, earlier this year pledging over a quarter of a million pounds to a range of conservation projects. This latest funding will go towards efforts to clamp down on the international trade in endangered species and to the Global Tiger Recovery Plan, which is working to double the number of the animals in the wild by 2022. 

The £1.3 million fund will contribute to vital projects across the world to help animals that are on the brink of extinction have a chance of survival. 

A breakdown of the projects receiving funding are: 

  • £312k – Global Tiger Recovery Programme – a global programme, running until 2022, being coordinated by the World Bank;
  • £312k – Contribution to the Nagoya Protocol Implementation
  • £200k – UK – Brazil workshop to develop biodiversity actions plans for countries across the world;
  • £120k – Zoological Society of London – Progressing REDD+ as a sustainable funding mechanism for tiger conservation in the Berbak National Park;
  • £100k – ABS Collaborative initiative with Colombia – to pursue an initiative on biodiversity with the Colombians;
  • £100k – The Great Apes Survival Project – shaping a new strategy for protecting this vulnerable species;
  • £50k – IUCN African elephant (AfESG) specialist group – AfESG work with African states on elephant conservation including the fight against poaching and illegal trade;
  • £50k – IUCN African rhino (AfRSG) specialist group.  AfRSG work with African states on rhino conservation;
  • £40K – To strengthen Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) implementation via the International Consortium for Combating Wildlife Crime;
  • £25k – Flagship Species Fund – an additional contribution to the £100k already given to Fauna and Flora International to support small-scale biodiversity projects around the world;
  • £14k – Rhino conservation – to a number of vital rhino conservation missions;
  • £14k – Ivory action plan verification missions – to combat the illegal trade in ivory; and
  • £10k – Zoological Society of London – fire fighting in Berbak National Park, to help safeguard a key tiger habitat.

Full content generated by Get Full RSS.
info4local Subject Documents

£1.3 million Government pledge to protect our most endangered species

£1.3 million is being invested in a range of projects dedicated to protecting some of the world’s most endangered and best-loved species, Environment Minister Richard Benyon announced today.

From supporting efforts to stamp out the barbaric trade in rhino horn to preserving habitats for fast-disappearing wild tigers, this new fund cements the UK’s commitment to leading the way in international conservation.

Environment Minister Richard Benyon said:

“Global action must be taken before these species are wiped out for good. Tigers, rhinos, elephants and apes are much loved animals that some of us take for granted. Yet many are suffering horrific deaths at the hands of poachers and traffickers or because their habitats are being destroyed. 

“It would be a travesty if these animals were allowed to disappear forever, which is why the UK Government is committed to leading the way in supporting such vital international conservation.

“We need to stop these animals disappearing forever and the projects receiving funding today are working to do just that, which is why I am so pleased to be able to support them.”

Defra has consistently supported efforts to protect tigers and rhinos in the wild, earlier this year pledging over a quarter of a million pounds to a range of conservation projects. This latest funding will go towards efforts to clamp down on the international trade in endangered species and to the Global Tiger Recovery Plan, which is working to double the number of the animals in the wild by 2022. 

The £1.3 million fund will contribute to vital projects across the world to help animals that are on the brink of extinction have a chance of survival. 

A breakdown of the projects receiving funding are: 

  • £312k – Global Tiger Recovery Programme – a global programme, running until 2022, being coordinated by the World Bank;
  • £312k – Contribution to the Nagoya Protocol Implementation
  • £200k – UK – Brazil workshop to develop biodiversity actions plans for countries across the world;
  • £120k – Zoological Society of London – Progressing REDD+ as a sustainable funding mechanism for tiger conservation in the Berbak National Park;
  • £100k – ABS Collaborative initiative with Colombia – to pursue an initiative on biodiversity with the Colombians;
  • £100k – The Great Apes Survival Project – shaping a new strategy for protecting this vulnerable species;
  • £50k – IUCN African elephant (AfESG) specialist group – AfESG work with African states on elephant conservation including the fight against poaching and illegal trade;
  • £50k – IUCN African rhino (AfRSG) specialist group.  AfRSG work with African states on rhino conservation;
  • £40K – To strengthen Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) implementation via the International Consortium for Combating Wildlife Crime;
  • £25k – Flagship Species Fund – an additional contribution to the £100k already given to Fauna and Flora International to support small-scale biodiversity projects around the world;
  • £14k – Rhino conservation – to a number of vital rhino conservation missions;
  • £14k – Ivory action plan verification missions – to combat the illegal trade in ivory; and
  • £10k – Zoological Society of London – fire fighting in Berbak National Park, to help safeguard a key tiger habitat.

Full content generated by Get Full RSS.
Defra News

New Study: 75 Percent of Imperiled U.S. Animals Lack Protection of Endangered Species Act

PORTLAND, Ore.— A study published in the international journal Conservation Letters this month found that nearly 75 percent of U.S. animals, or about 531 species, that are classified as imperiled by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature are not protected under the Endangered Species Act. The study highlights the need for more funding for the Act as well as an expedited protection process.


“Our study found that hundreds of imperiled animals are not receiving the protection they need to survive,” said Bert Harris, lead author of the study and a graduate student at the University of Adelaide in Australia. “The Endangered Species Act is the world’s most effective law for saving species, but it can only work if species are protected as threatened or endangered.”


Many of the animals identified in the study have been under consideration for protection for years, but got caught in a large backlog of species needing protection at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Under a settlement agreement reached in July between the agency and the Center for Biological Diversity, many of these species will get protection decisions in the next five years, including the Gunnison sage grouse, Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog, Florida bonneted bat, Kittlitz’s murrelet, Jollyville plateau salamander and Oregon spotted frog.


“Our settlement agreement is a good first step toward protecting animals that desperately need the lifeline of the Endangered Species Act,” said Noah Greenwald, the Center’s endangered species director. “But even with our settlement, this study shows, there are hundreds of species not even being considered for protection under the Act. It would be a tragedy if America’s incredible heritage of native wildlife vanished from the Earth just because we were too cheap and bureaucratic to protect it.”           


In total, the study identified 18 mammals, 25 birds, 44 amphibians and 444 invertebrates that are considered imperiled by IUCN — the foremost international authority on the conservation status of animals and plants — and may need protection under the Endangered Species Act.

Contact Info: Bert Harris, 61 451852859, [email protected]

Noah Greenwald, (503) 484-7495

Website : Center for Biological Diversity

Full content generated by Get Full RSS.
ENN Network News – ENN

Proposed Obama Policy on Endangered Species Act Is Recipe for Extinction

WASHINGTON— The Obama administration released a draft policy Thursday interpreting a key phrase in the Endangered Species Act that determines when species qualify for protection. Under the Act, an endangered species is defined as any species “in danger of extinction in all or a significant of portion of its range.” The phrase “significant portion of range” is important, because it means that species need not be at risk of extinction globally to receive protection. The policy proposed Thursday sharply limits interpretation of this phrase by both defining “significant” to mean only where the species currently exists, not its historic range and by defining significant to mean that loss of the species from that portion of range would threaten the survival of the species as a whole.


“Under the policy proposed today, a species could be absolutely gone or close to vanishing almost everywhere it’s always lived — but not qualify for protection because it can still be called secure on one tiny patch of land,” said Noah Greenwald, endangered species director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “The policy absolutely undermines the spirit of the Endangered Species Act and will be a recipe for extinction of our native wildlife if it’s finalized — a loophole that’s really a black hole. It will allow for massive species decline and habitat destruction.”


The draft policy retains a key aspect of a similar Bush-era policy adopted in 2007, which also argued that loss of historic range need not be considered when determining if a species is endangered in a significant portion of its range. The approach has been criticized by scientists as a “shifting baseline,” whereby the history of species is ignored. A study published by the Center in the international journal Conservation Biology cited the Colorado River cutthroat trout as a case in point: The trout was denied protection even though Fish and Wildlife acknowledged it has been lost in 87 percent of its historic range, including the biggest and best streams, and continues to face many threats.


“The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has long been criticized for only protecting species on the very brink of extinction, which makes recovery a difficult uphill slog,” said Greenwald. “This policy would actually codify that approach, essentially saying: Let’s only protect these creatures when they’re in as desperate a state as possible.”


The policy does reverse one aspect of the Bush administration policy that limited Endangered Species Act protections only to places where species were considered endangered, rather than their entire range. The policy was applied to several species, including the gray wolf and Preble’s meadow jumping mouse, but was overturned by the courts. 


But in a classic example of government doublespeak, today’s draft policy says that a species being endangered in a significant portion of range provides an independent basis for protection; it then defines the phrase to mean that the species must be at risk in all of its range. As with the “historic range” dodge, this will allow the agency to ignore species loss in significant areas and not provide protection. Fish and Wildlife did just this in a recent decision to deny protection to cactus ferruginous pygmy owls, even though the animal is at risk of being lost in the entirety of the Sonoran Desert of Arizona and Mexico. 


“Future generations will look back at the mass extinctions of our time with nothing but sadness and regret,” said Greenwald. “Yet the agencies the American people trust to prevent these irreversible extinctions constantly seek to limit their own ability to stop species dying off. It’s both tragic and absurd.” 

Contact Info: Noah Greenwald, (503) 484-7495

Website : Center for Biological Diversity

Full content generated by Get Full RSS.
ENN Network News – ENN