Posts Tagged ‘safeguard’

Framework for the design and implementation of national REDD+ safeguard systems

This report provides a framework for the national implementation of REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) safeguards. These safeguards are needed to ensure effective implementation of REDD+ so that it does not inadvertently harm communities and ecosystems. The framework provides a roadmap for navigating some of the choices that will arise in REDD+ design and implementation.

After providing context and definitions, the report explains the unique nature of the UNFCCC REDD+ safeguards. Consisting of only broad substantive and procedural goals, they remain flexible in terms of methodology and minimum requirements. This allows countries to take new, culturally-sensitive approaches with their own national safeguard systems. The remainder of the report is then split into three sections relating to the creation of a national system: goals, functions, and rules and institutions.

The report defines national REDD+ goals, with one suggestion being safeguards to provide a floor, below which protection for people and the environment cannot fall. The functions of the REDD+ safeguards regard the processes by which goals are achieved. Functions of a national system should cover anticipating risks, planning to avoid or mitigate risks and maximise opportunities, managing implementation, monitoring, and responding to positive and negative outcomes. The process of assessing, improving and creating rules and institutions is discussed. The report offers advice on the types of rules available and notes the need for all institutions involved to be transparent, participatory and accountable.

Throughout the report, examples are highlighted from efforts to create and implement national REDD+ safeguard systems in Brazil, Indonesia and Mexico. Examples of civil society groups and communities participating in the formulation and implementation of safeguard principles are presented, as well as the various legislation efforts. The process for achieving representative institutions in these countries is complicated and has seen mixed results. The lesson from this is the need to systematically ensure full representation of the most vulnerable voices.

Environment

English Heritage: New English Heritage guidance helps safeguard the special character of historic chapels

New English Heritage guidance helps safeguard the special character of historic chapels that may not remain in use.

Methodist and Nonconformist chapels in Cornwall are vulnerable to decay and closure because of long-term maintenance problems, ageing congregations and small communities that struggle to keep them in good condition. Over 900 chapels have been recorded across the county, but under 250 now remain in religious or community use. The great majority of the others have been converted to other uses, very often domestic. Such new uses can retain their distinctive character, especially if they remain in some form of community use, but in many cases this has been lost due to changes that have removed or hidden the features that made them special.

English Heritage, The Methodist Church and Cornwall Council have produced joint guidance to help local communities make important decisions about the future use of these special buildings which safeguard their character, especially when they are no longer in religious use. The guidance helps new owners to safeguard their character whilst recognising that some adaptation may be needed to give them a sustainable future. The guidance is published on the English Heritage website:

The Guidance for Methodist and Non-Conformist Chapels in Cornwall is divided into two parts with ‘The Chapels Assessment Framework’ aimed at planning officers and applicants, including agents and architects who may be considering new uses for chapels, including where conversion to residential use is accepted as the optimum viable use. The second part, ‘The Historic Chapels in Cornwall’ provides guidance on the historic character and significance of chapels and looks at the issues facing chapel communities.

Methodism in Cornwall

Chapels and their communities developed as an important part of Cornish culture and its landscape, especially after Methodism took root from the late 18th century. Many Cornish people migrated to Australia, the Americas and other parts of the world in the 19th century, taking their mining expertise and technology, they also took their religious conviction and established chapels to serve their new communities.

Cornwall has one of the highest concentrations of Methodist and Nonconformist chapels in England including 184 listed chapels – 30% of the national total. Eighteen are listed at Grade II* for their rarity and historical significance as outstanding examples of their type, and one, the Quaker meeting house at Come-to-Good, Kea, is listed at Grade I. Most chapels date from the 19th century, often resulting from successive phases of rebuilding and reordering, and there is a great variety of size and architectural style.


The Value of the New Guidance

Jeremy Lake, English Heritage expert and co-author of the new guidance said: “The greatest number of chapel closures within the Methodist Church is in Cornwall, and in coming years more chapels will close and be sold with many being converted to residential housing. The challenge with those that remain open is how to maintain them while for those that close it is to find appropriate new uses for them that respect, so far as possible, their interiors. This guidance provides a way of helping owners, estate agents, communities and planners to manage sensitive change to all chapels and find a sustainable future for the most significant and vulnerable ones.”

Joanne Balmforth, Conservation Officer for the Methodist Church, said: “We are extremely proud of the built heritage and legacy resulting from the Methodists presence in the Cornwall area. We support the use of this guidance to conserve what we consider to be buildings of exceptional quality, often retaining intact interiors of significant national interest. We welcome this guidance as a serious attempt to inform and guide those with an interest in the conservation of Nonconformist chapels, whether it be managing sensitive alterations to extend their use, or in finding a sustainable and appropriate new use if the building is no longer in use as a Place of Worship.”

Councillor Colin Brewer, Cornwall Council’s Heritage Champion said: “We are delighted to have been able to work with English Heritage and the Methodist Church on this guidance, which will be a major step forward in taking an informed, consistent and sensible approach to the future of our unique legacy of chapels here in Cornwall. This is not a remote academic issue for those of us, whether Methodist or not, who have grown up with or come to value these chapels as part of our landscape, our shared identity, or our personal histories. It means much to us to know that we can work with partners to make sure that these special places will have that same presence in the lives of future generations in Cornwall.”

Mark Kaczmarek, Cornwall Council Cabinet Member for Housing and Planning said: “These Methodist Chapels are as important for our towns and villages as the Cornish Engine Houses, they a truly a part of our identity and worthy of protecting. My report endorsing the guidance given by English Heritage has just been submitted to the Planning Advisory Panel today and has had unanimous support from the panel members. The council’s planning officers will be delighted to be able to use this document when considering any change of use/ conversions.”


Examples of Successful and Sensitive Conversions

  • The 1884 Wesleyan chapel at Gulval is now a studio. It exemplifies a design type where the Sunday School and other rooms are accommodated within a basement underneath the chapel.
  • The former Wesleyan chapel at Manhay, listed grade II in Wendron parish,  has been converted to a residential property but retains its fine facade, with rusticated surrounds to the door and sash windows.
  • The Gothic style 1903 Alexandra Road Chapel in Penzance has been converted into residential flats and relates well to housing of the same period.


info4local Subject Documents

Nation rallies to safeguard iconic White Cliffs of Dover

A £1.2 million appeal launched by the National Trust in the summer to raise funds to acquire the iconic stretch of the White Cliffs of Dover coastline has reached its target in just 133 days, raising an average of £9,000 per day.

The Trust needed the money to buy a 0.8 mile stretch of this world-famous and much-loved piece of the Kent coastline overlooking the port. 

It completes the missing link of coastline under National Trust care, uniting a stretch of more than 7km (nearly 5 miles) between the Trust’s visitor centre and South Foreland Lighthouse.

More than 16,000 people and organisations* have supported the White Cliffs of Dover appeal which was launched in June 2012 with an average donation of £40.21 (including Gift Aid) from members of the public. 

Hundreds of messages of support were posted on a virtual White Cliffs of Dover on the charity’s website**. 

Donations from supporters included a significant contribution from the Dover Harbour Board, which helped the Trust to reach its target earlier than had been anticipated, and support from the Regatta Foundation, Royal Oak Foundation and 16 National Trust supporter groups.

The fundraising drive was given a boost in July when a number of household names including Dame Vera Lynn, Dame Judi Dench and the soul singing sensation and Dover-born Joss Stone gave their support.

Writer and philosopher Julian Baggini spent a week in August at the White Cliffs in Dover looking into how they have come to symbolise what they mean for the UK’s national identity***.

Fiona Reynolds, who is in her final week as Director-General at the National Trust, said: “Thanks to the generosity and support of thousands of people we’ve reached our target nearly two months early.

“The Trust will now look to enhance the quality of access to this new land and build on some of the fantastic nature conservation work that has been carried out by the team on the ground.”

Standing proud at over 110 metres (taller than Big Ben or the same height as twenty-five London buses stacked on top of each other), the White Cliffs of Dover have witnessed many dramatic moments in England’s history.

These include the arrival of the Romans and the welcome return of British armed forces after the evacuation of Dunkirk during the Second World War. 

The cliffs are also home to a rich array of wildlife including the Adonis blue butterfly, rare coastal plants such as oxtongue broomrape and sea carrot, and birds including skylark, the only pair of breeding ravens in Kent and peregrine falcons.

Alison Burnett, a volunteer on the White Cliffs of Dover team, added: “There has been a real buzz around the appeal with this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to add the missing piece of the White Cliffs so that they are in the care of the National Trust.”

Hundreds of thousands of people come to visit the dramatic chalk cliffs every year with their wonderful views across the English Channel.

Notes to editors:

* The total number of people and organisations that donated to the White Cliffs of Dover appeal is 16,570.
** Examples of the messages of support and messages about why the White Cliffs of Dover matter can be found at www.nationaltrust.org.uk/whitecliffsappeal
** ‘A Home on the Rock’ by Julian Baggini was published in October and can be read on the blog that ran during his residency – whitecliffsofdoverwriter.wordpress.com

About The National Trust:

The National Trust looks after more than 250,000 hectares of countryside, 720 miles of coastline and hundreds of historic places across England, Wales and Northern Ireland. For more information on countryside conservation, and ideas for great value family days out, go to: www.nationaltrust.org.uk

PR Contact:

Mike Collins
The National Trust
Heelis
Kemble Drive
Swindon
SN2 2NA
01793 817709
www.nationaltrust.org.uk
Custom Release Wire

Manage Protected Areas Outside and In to Safeguard Biodiversity

A new study, published online by Nature this week, has concluded that managing the areas surrounded protected sites is as important as regulating the activities that take place inside, if biodiversity in tropical forest areas is to be conserved. The research, led by William F. Laurance at the James Cook University in Australia and involving over 100 collaborating authors, assessed the efficacy of 60 protected areas across Asia, America and Africa. Half of the reserves were deemed by the research team to not be performing ‘effectively or passably’ in safeguarding biodiversity.

Laurance et al. insist however that they are not aiming through the study to diminish the importance of protected areas as conservation tools. Instead they aim to highlight the challenges facing protected areas, so that these can be mitigated. Improving our understanding of the pressures impinging upon protected areas and how these can be ameliorated is fundamental to the success of meeting target number 11 under the Aichi Biodiversity Targets agreed by the signatories to the Convention on Biological Diversity in Nagoya, Japan, in 2010:

‘By 2020 at least 17% of terrestrial and inland waters and 10% of coastal and marine areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, are conserved through effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative and well connected systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures and integrated into the wider landscapes and seascapes.’

According to a Nature editorial commenting on the research, assessments of biodiversity and ecosystem services to date have been hampered by piecemeal data collection and incomparable methodologies, a function of funding constraints and the difficulties of assessing complex systems. Laurance et al’s analysis therefore marks a significant achievement in filling data and knowledge gaps with respect to tropical forest protected sites.

The researchers carried out 262 interviews with field biologists and environmental scientists, with each asked to complete a 10-page questionnaire. This allowed the team to compile a dataset assessing 20 – 30 years of changes to 31 functional groups of species and on 21 potential drivers of environmental change, for 60 protected areas. The potential drivers of change assessed included road building, hunting and forest product extraction.The researchers claim that data have to date been unavailable for such a sufficiently large and representative sample of reserves.

Laurance et al found that across the 60 reserves there was an alarming ‘erosion of biodiversity that is often widespread taxonomically and functionally’, with biodiversity declines in approximately half of the sites. Eighty five per cent of reserves had experienced declines in the forest cover surrounding the sites, with only two per cent of sites seeing an increase in the adjacent forest cover. The researchers conclude that environmental changes such as these outside the reserves were nearly as important as those inside in determining the state of biodiversity within the protected areas.

The papers’ authors suggest that the best strategy for maintaining biodiversity within protected areas in the tropics is to protect them against major proximate threats, particularly from over-harvesting and habitat destruction. Furthermore they recommend the creation and maintenance of sizeable buffer zones around the protected areas, with substantial connections preserved or enhanced to other forested areas. Finally, local communities must be engaged in the conservation of protected areas and should be encouraged to practice low impact land use in areas surrounding reserves.

Laurance et al (2012) Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature doi:10.1038/nature11318.

Tags: , , , ,

BES Ecology & Policy Blog

Environment Agency: Compulsory release of all salmon and sea trout introduced on River Wye to safeguard stocks

A new byelaw has come into force on the River Wye this week aimed at safeguarding its salmon and sea trout population, Environment Agency Wales has confirmed.

The byelaw requires the mandatory release of all salmon and sea trout caught by anglers on the River Wye in Wales and England.

Releasing 100% of salmon and sea trout will enable more fish to survive and spawn upstream and produce more juvenile fish to boost the declining population.

The byelaw was approved by Welsh Government and Defra ministers this week. It could be in place for up to 10 years but results will be reviewed annually, with a full review midway through.

Anyone found to be contravening these byelaws could face prosecution and a substantial fine.

Declining stocks reason for byelaw

The decision to introduce the byelaw was driven by the continuing decline of salmon and sea trout stocks in the River Wye.
 
Although many anglers on the Wye are already returning salmon and sea trout, too many continue to kill their catch.

This byelaw will enable anglers to continue with their sport whilst safeguarding the fish.

A lot of work has been done to improve habitats for fish and it is important that the fish survive to spawn in these improved areas.

The Agency, and its main partner the Wye and Usk Foundation, have also invested in building fish passes and removing barriers to improve access for migratory fish and improving water quality.

Pete Gough, Environment Agency Wales, said:

“The majority of anglers are very responsible and do release the salmon and sea trout they catch. However, there are some that continue to kill the fish before they have a chance to spawn upstream.

“Any of these fish that are killed will have an impact and slow down the recovery of the population in these rivers which will take many years.

“We will be monitoring the stocks closely and will lift the measure in the future if the stocks recover sufficiently.”

info4local Subject Documents

A Review of the Three REDD+ Safeguard Initiatives


Authors:
; UNREDD



Publisher:
[publisher information not available], 2011

While the AWG-LCA decision forms the basis for safeguards in the context of support for readiness and REDD+, questions remain as to how they will be interpreted and applied, the extent of the benefit that they can provide and the challenges in their implementation. This background paper seeks to contribute to the discussion on practical experiences regarding safeguards by informing workshop participants about current approaches to the application of social and environmental standards and principles. It highlights the current REDD+ safeguard initiatives from the FCPF, UN- REDD Programme, and other initiatives, and the lessons learned and anticipated challenges to application of REDD+ safeguards.

Environment

Legal changes to safeguard flexible household recycling services

Defra will make technical changes to the Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2011 to ensure multi-bin recycling systems are not imposed on residents.

The technical changes will make sure the legislation is in line with new EU rules, including guidance which is currently undergoing consultation. The changes will mean that local authorities will be able to choose the types of recycling services local people want, while ensuring quality recycling is collected.

Defra passed legislation in March which brought the requirements of the EU-revised Waste Framework Directive into UK law.  This legislation is currently subject to a Judicial Review.  The new draft EU guidance and the Judicial Review process have since highlighted that technical changes are needed to prevent the risk of the legislation being overturned, which could lead to more restrictive recycling collection systems being imposed on local councils and residents.

Defra will seek the views of industry, local authorities and other interested parties to inform the change to be made to the legislation.

Full content generated by Get Full RSS.
Defra News

Federal Agencies to Improve Coordination to Support Energy Development and Safeguard Air Quality (HQ)

 

Release date: 06/24/2011

Contact Information: Betsaida Alcantara (EPA), [email protected], 202-564-6794 / Kate Kelly (DOI), 202-208-6416 / Courtney Rowe (USDA), 202-720-4623

WASHINGTON – In keeping with President Obama’s strategy to expand domestic oil and gas production safely and responsibly, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) today released an interagency approach to address air quality issues associated with onshore oil and gas development on public lands.

A new Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) establishes a common process for the agencies to follow in analyzing the potential air quality impacts of proposed oil and gas activities on federally managed public lands. The collaborative approach established in the MOU will increase efficiency, certainty and transparency in the process – benefitting industry, federal agencies, states, and Tribes.

“Today’s agreement will align federal agencies so that oil and natural gas development in the United States is achieved in a way that also protects important environmental resources,” said EPA Deputy Administrator Bob Perciasepe. “Working with our federal partners, we are committed to delivering an environmental review process that is both transparent and comprehensive, supporting responsible domestic energy production on federal lands while ensuring environmental protection.”

“This agreement is an important step forward for our nation’s energy security,” said Deputy Secretary of the Interior David J. Hayes. “This agreement helps institutionalize the type of collaborative effort that created a path forward for the Greater Natural Buttes gas project in Utah and that encouraged the use of best practices and sensible air pollution control technologies. We want to build on lessons learned to establish clearer lines of communication and a predictable, common sense process for ensuring prompt and thorough reviews of proposed oil and gas projects.”

“This agreement ensures we do not have to sacrifice clean air in our communities nor our protected public landscapes when oil and gas development occurs,” said Agriculture Deputy Secretary Kathleen Merrigan. “This is a good example of what the President called for in his State of the Union address to find creative and innovative ways for government to work better together.”

Previously, federal agencies responsible for land management and air quality reviews associated with oil and gas development made decisions based on individual agency protocols. Agencies used different approaches when determining the adequacy of air quality analyses and mitigation; the stage in oil and gas activities—planning, leasing, or permitting—when air quality analyses should occur; and the appropriate thresholds and resource conditions to use as the starting point for analyzing impacts to visibility and other air quality related values (AQRVs). These differences often resulted in project delays.

To alleviate these delays and improve interagency coordination, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), EPA, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Park Service, and the USDA Forest Service worked to establish mutually acceptable procedures for conducting air quality analyses as part of the environmental review required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA requires all federal agencies to evaluate and disclose the potential environmental impacts of their proposed actions in a public process.

Today’s agreement builds upon the best practices applied in a recent successful interagency collaboration on a major natural gas development project in Utah. The Greater Natural Buttes Area Gas Development Project had been delayed, in part, over concerns about its potential impacts on air quality in the Uintah Basin, which has seen some of the highest winter time ozone levels in the nation. Over the last several months, the BLM and EPA worked closely with the project proponent to develop a mitigation plan to significantly reduce the project’s potential impacts, an important step forward for a project that could include up to 3,675 new gas wells over 10 years and produce more than 6 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.

The MOU outlines a number of steps the agencies will take to ensure that federal laws protecting air quality, human health, and the environment are balanced with the nation’s energy needs. The agreement provides for early interagency consultation throughout the NEPA process; common procedures for determining what type of air quality analyses are appropriate and when air modeling is necessary; specific provisions for analyzing and discussing impacts to air quality and for mitigating such impacts; and a dispute resolution process to facilitate timely resolution of differences among agencies.

To view the MOU: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/policies/nepa/index.html

More information about NEPA: http://epa.gov/compliance/nepa/index.html

U.S. EPA News

Papal Message on Peace and the Environment Emphasizes Humanity’s Responsibility to Safeguard the Environment

The Vatican’s permanent diplomatic representative to Kenya on Tuesday re-emphasized humanity’s intrinsic connection to the environment and the well being of the planet.

Further information:

Article source

UN wildlife conference enhances intergovernmental cooperation to safeguard sharks

Governments combat the overexploitation of sharks as their commercial value increases

Bonn/Manila, 12 February 2010 – A new landmark agreement to counteract the alarming decline of sharks was concluded on Friday under the auspices of the UNEP administered Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS). Government representatives meeting in Manila, Philippines, agreed on the text of a Memorandum of Understanding on the conservation of migratory sharks.

At the meeting, delegates agreed to include all seven shark species in the CMS appendices under this agreement: the Great White, Basking, Whale, Porbeagle, Spiny Dogfish, Shortfin and Longfin Mako Sharks. They are to benefit from better international protection by fishing nations through reduction of threats, in particular illegal fishing and trade, by enforcing existing laws.

CMS Executive Secretary Elizabeth Maruma Mrema said: “This first global CMS instrument on commercially exploited species is a decisive step forward in international shark conservation. Wildlife Conventions, UN Agencies and international fisheries need to work together to prevent these creatures that roam the world’s oceans from becoming extinct.”

The goal of the CMS agreement is the restoration and long term viability of populations of migratory sharks covered by the instrument. A conservation and management plan was thoroughly discussed as a first step towards international cooperation on the protection of sharks. By signing this agreement, countries have expressed their willingness to conserve the endangered shark species covered under this agreement.

According to the IUCN Red List 2010, 17% of 1,044 shark species are threatened. At present, our knowledge of about 47% of shark species is too limited to even assess if they are threatened.

Over-fishing, fisheries by-catch, illegal trade, habitat destruction, depletion of prey species, pollution with a high risk of mercury intoxication, boat strikes and the impact of climate change on the marine environment seriously threaten sharks. Sharks have slow growth with a gestation period of up to 22 months. They might reach maturity only after 20 years years and produce relatively few young. Being top predators, their natural mortality is low. Sharks have high life-expectancy: Whales Sharks can live up to 100 years. Some shark species are highly migratory, which makes it difficult to protect the species and its habitat across a global range. These biological characteristics make sharks particularly vulnerable with little chance to recover if overfished.

Some species such as Mako Sharks are targeted for sports fishing, trophy hunting, and as cure in traditional medicine. According to the IUCN Red List of the World Conservation Union, 14 shark species are “critically endangered” and face an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild.

Sharks suffer from overexploitation as both target and non target catch. According to the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), up to 900,000 metric tons of sharks have been caught every year for the last two decades. However, taking into account illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing and missing data , the catch figure is expected to be at least twice as high.

Since the late 1980s Whale Shark meat has been increasingly considered as a high-grade product and gained acceptance by consumers as an exotic food, and prices began to skyrocket. TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network, reported 2000 kg of Whale Shark meat sold in Taiwan for USD 7,000 (€ 4,500).

Total catches in global shark fisheries are still increasing, while some populations have already crashed. Studies reveal that shark populations collapsed in the Northwest Atlantic by 75% within 15 years, and both in the Gulf of Mexico and in the Mediterranean Sea by 90%. Valuable fish and crustacean fisheries such as high sea long-line and driftnet fleets that target tuna, sword fish, sail fish and marlin claim an unsustainably high death toll on sharks.

Although a shark finning ban was adopted as of mid 2007 by 19 countries, the European Union and 9 Regional Fisheries Management Organizations for fishing vessels in their waters, sharks continue to be hunted. High demand and price of shark fins have triggered increased hunting activities. While the finless bodies are dumped into the sea, fins can be easily stored on board of fishing vessels without competing for storage space with more valuable fish species. This gives a considerable incentive for finning and exacerbates the problem of overexploitation.

A growing number of commercially exploited sharks have been listed on the appendices of CMS and CITES. The Spiny Dogfish and the Porbeagle Shark are being proposed by governments for inclusion on CITES Appendix II to avoid overexploitation by imposing controls in trade.

Short and long-finned Mako Sharks, the Porbeagle Shark and the Spiny Dogfish continue to be seriously threatened by over-fishing despite their indispensable role in the oceans’ ecosystems. Their listing on CMS Appendix II encourages range states to conclude international agreements.

The first global instrument on sharks is expected to complement existing international wildlife conservation agreements, fisheries agreements and regional fisheries management organizations. CMS Appendix I lists migratory sharks that are threatened with extinction. Member states to the Convention shall prohibit their hunting, fishing and deliberate killing and implement comprehensive conservation activities. In the view of overall declining marine biodiversity and overfishing of top predators in particular, the CMS Sharks agreement renews efforts during the International Year of Biodiversity to counteract the global loss of biodiversity.

Notes to Editors:

The Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals, also known as the Bonn Convention works for the conservation of a wide array of endangered migratory animals worldwide through the negotiation and implementation of agreements and species action plans. With currently 113 member countries, many of them in Africa, CMS is a fast-growing convention with special importance due to its expertise in the field of migratory species.

The FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries aims to facilitate long term sustainable use of the world’s fish stocks. The FAO International Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks (IPOA) is based on this Code of Conduct. The IPOA-Sharks is a voluntary international instrument for nations to take action to ensure the conservation and management of sharks and their long-term sustainable use by developing and implementing complementary National Plans of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks (NPOA-sharks). UN General Assembly resolutions 59/25, 61/105 and 62/177 concern the implementation of the IPOA-Sharks.

The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) provides a framework for the conservation and management of fisheries. Coastal States have the obligation to ensure fish stocks occurring within 200 nautical miles away from the coast.

The UN Fish Stocks Agreement elaborates upon provisions of UNCLOS and aims to greatly improve the international management of fishing on the high seas. Its purpose is to ensure the long-term conservation and sustainable use of straddling and highly migratory fish stocks through global, regional and sub-regional fisheries management organizations.

The Barcelona Convention is to prevent and reduce pollution from ships, aircraft and land based sources in the Mediterranean Sea. Together with its protocols and the Mediterranean Action Plan, form part of the UNEPRegional Seas Programme.

Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs) are responsible for managing fish stocks on high seas and those which migrate through the waters of more than just a single State. However, no RFMO is dedicated explicitly to the conservation and management of sharks.

For more information please contact:

Veronika Lenarz, Public Information, UNEP/CMS Secretariat, on Tel.: +49 228 815 2409 or e-mail: [email protected], www.cms.int

UNEP/CMS Secretariat

Public Information

Herrman-Ehlers-Str. 10

53113 Bonn, Germany

T. +49 228 815-2409

F. +49 228 815-2449

www.cms.int

Governments combat the overexploitation of sharks as their commercial value increases

Further information:

Article source