Posts Tagged ‘rules’

BIO Comments on EPA’s 2013 Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) Rules

WASHINGTON–()–The Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) recently submitted
comments to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on the proposed
Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: 2013 Renewable Fuel Standards
(RFS).

“BIO supports EPA’s continued recognition that
many factors must be taken into consideration in developing projections
of the proposed Cellulosic Biofuel Volumes for 2013, and that
information obtained directly from cellulosic biofuel producers should
be evaluated in addition to the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s
(“EIA”

The comments emphasized that continued stable implementation of the RFS
provides companies developing innovative new advanced and cellulosic
biofuels confidence that the U.S. fuel market will remain open, if they
can produce the fuels. “BIO supports EPA’s continued recognition that
many factors must be taken into consideration in developing projections
of the proposed Cellulosic Biofuel Volumes for 2013, and that
information obtained directly from cellulosic biofuel producers should
be evaluated in addition to the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s
(“EIA”) estimate,” said Brent Erickson, executive vice president of
BIO’s Industrial & Environmental Section.

BIO also cautioned against setting volumes for cellulosic and advanced
biofuels that would become a self-fulfilling prophecy, by discouraging
biofuel developers from aiming higher. “EPA also correctly observes that
perennial legal and legislative challenges to the RFS, and budget and
regulatory uncertainty in complementary federal biofuels policy, have
caused some technology investors to question the long term RIN value of
cellulosic biofuel. However, EPA must carefully avoid in its rulemaking
creating additional incentive for biofuel opponents to impede cellulosic
biofuel commercialization through legal, regulatory and legislative
interference,” Erickson wrote.

BIO also recommended that EPA not set the 2014 volumes for the RFS
advanced biofuel volumes before the statutory deadline. And in response
to requests for comments on the “blend wall,” Erickson noted: “BIO
firmly believes that the limits to market access for biofuels commonly
referred to collectively as the blendwall represent a series of barriers
contrived by obligated parties to prevent biofuels from gaining access
to the marketplace. Multiple avenues exist for blending additional
volumes of biofuel into the nation’s fuel supply.”

About BIO

BIO represents more than 1,100 biotechnology companies, academic
institutions, state biotechnology centers and related organizations
across the United States and in more than 30 other nations. BIO members
are involved in the research and development of innovative healthcare,
agricultural, industrial and environmental biotechnology products. BIO
also produces the BIO International Convention, the world’s largest
gathering of the biotechnology industry, along with industry-leading
investor and partnering meetings held around the world. BIO produces BIOtechNOW,
an online portal and monthly newsletter chronicling “innovations
transforming our world.” Subscribe
to BIOtechNOW
.

Upcoming BIO Events

BIO
International Convention

April 22 – 25, 2013
Chicago, IL

World
Congress on Industrial Biotechnology

June 16 – 19, 2013
Montreal,
Quebec, Canada

Business Wire Environment News

Intergraph(R) Releases CADWorx(R) 2013 R2 With Enhanced Legacy Model Conversion and Components Review and New Rules and AutoCAD(R) Plant Import Capabilities

HOUSTON, TX–(Marketwire – Feb 6, 2013) – Intergraph has released CADWorx 2013 R2 with new capabilities for converting legacy models, reviewing legacy components, importing new AutoCAD® Plant 3D data and specifications, and applying auto coupling, line number and change data rules. The release also provides model review updates and enhancements for setting up component formats and importing legacy information. These updates are in addition to the major enhancements and new capabilities in CADWorx 2013, the most advanced version of Intergraph’s popular AutoCAD®-based intelligent 3D design and modeling software that is one of the most powerful plant design solutions on the market.

For a list of enhancements in this release, visit http://coade.typepad.com/coadeinsider/2013/02/cadworx-2013-r2-released.html. For information about CADWorx 2013, visit http://www.coade.com/products/cadworx-plant.

For more information on Intergraph CADWorx, visit http://www.intergraph.com/products/ppm/cadworx/. For information on Intergraph analysis products visit http://www.intergraph.com/ppm/analysis.aspx.

About Intergraph CADWorx & Analysis Solutions
The Intergraph CADWorx & Analysis Solutions (CAS) products allow design and engineering to share relevant information seamlessly, thereby maintaining accuracy and improving efficiency. They include CADWorx Plant Design Suite for AutoCAD®-based intelligent plant design modeling, process schematics and automatic production of plant design deliverables; CADWorx DraftPro for intelligent 2D design and layout; CAESAR II, the world’s most widely used pipe stress analysis software; PV Elite for vessel and exchanger design and analysis; and TANK for the design and analysis of oil storage tanks. For information on Intergraph CAS, visit www.coade.com.

Intergraph, the Intergraph logo, CADWorx, CAESAR II and PV Elite are registered trademarks, and TANK is a trademark of Intergraph Corporation. Other brands and product names are trademarks of their respective owners. © 2013 Intergraph Corp. All rights reserved.

Marketwire – Environment

Red diesel rules relaxed in cold snap

During extreme weather farmers can use red diesel in their tractors to help grit and clear snow from public roads, HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) confirmed today.

Under normal rules any vehicle that is being used to clear snow from public roads using a snow plough or similar device is entitled to use red diesel. However, only vehicles that are constructed or adapted and used solely for spreading material on roads to deal with frost, ice and snow can undertake gritting work while using red diesel.

HMRC recognises the vital role played by farmers in helping to keep rural roads clear and has recently consulted on a proposed change to the legislation to allow red diesel to be used in tractors while gritting. A summary of consultation responses will be published shortly. During periods of extreme weather, HMRC will adopt a pragmatic approach to the rules. This means that agricultural tractors on public roads clearing snow or gritting to provide access to schools, hospitals, a remote dwelling, or communities cut off by ice and snow can continue to use red diesel.

For more details call the Excise and Customs Helpline on 0845 010 9000.

Defra News

Paper examining the impacts of Clean Development Mechanism rules on renewable energy investment and governance in Ethiopia


Paper examining the impacts of Clean Development Mechanism rules on renewable energy investment and governance in Ethiopia


Authors:
S. Hoch



EPA Proposes Approval of Public Participation Rules in Texas’ Clean-Air Plan (TX)

 

Release Date: 11/30/2012
Contact Information: Dave Bary, Austin Vela or Jennah Durant at 214-665-2200 or [email protected]

(DALLAS – November 30, 2012) The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed to approve the Texas clean-air plan that covers public notification requirements for facilities applying for air permits. The proposed approval applies to existing facilities that plan to make major changes as well as new projects.

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) clarified the clean-air plan’s procedures for citizens to submit comments on permit applications, as well as how TCEQ is to respond to comments. The revised rules give citizens two opportunities to provide comments on air permits. The first notice occurs when a facility applies for a permit, and the second notice occurs when the TCEQ submits a proposed permit. The second notice will also include expanded technical documents to ensure citizens and interested groups have as much information as possible on pending permits.

“Robust public participation is an essential element of the Clean Air Act,” said EPA Regional Administrator Ron Curry. “The revised rules assure that Texas has all the relevant information and public input to make their permitting process as transparent and effective as possible.”

After extensive cooperation and dialog between TCEQ and the EPA, the State revised the public participation rules to apply to new and existing facilities that are classified as major or minor sources of pollution and submitted a State Implementation Plan for EPA action.

The proposed action will be published in the Federal Register in 7 to 10 days and be available for a 60 day public comment period. After careful consideration of any comments received from the public, the EPA will publish a final decision.

The Federal Register Notice is available at http://www.epa.gov/region6/newsevents/index.html

More information about the Clean Air Act is available at http://www.epa.gov/air/caa/peg/

More about activities in EPA Region 6 is available at http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/region6.html

# # #


U.S. EPA News

EPA Approves Florida’s Rules to Protect Waterways from Nutrient Pollution (FL)

 

Release Date: 11/30/2012
Contact Information: Davina Marraccini, 404-562-8293 (direct), 404-562-8400 (main), [email protected]

ATLANTA – EPA has approved the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s (FDEP) rules to protect Florida’s waterways from excess nitrogen and phosphorus. These pollutants, called “nutrients,” cause algal blooms, contaminate drinking water supplies and are among the largest contributors to water quality problems in Florida. FDEP’s rules establish numeric limits on the amount of nutrient pollution allowed in statewide springs, lakes, streams and some estuaries. Following a thorough review of the state’s adopted rules and supporting documents, EPA determined they are consistent with the requirements of the Clean Water Act and applicable federal regulations for the water bodies they cover.

“Nutrient pollution threatens human health and the environment, hurts businesses, costs jobs, reduces property values and otherwise impacts the quality of life for all Floridians,” said EPA Regional Administrator Gwen Keyes Fleming. “Clean water is vital for Florida and EPA commends FDEP for taking this significant step towards protecting and restoring water quality across the state.”

EPA determined that FDEP’s new method of deriving numeric limits for the amount of nutrient pollution allowed in lakes, springs, streams and estuaries is technically and scientifically sound, and more effective and efficient than the previous narrative approach. The numeric limits for nitrogen and phosphorus in springs, lakes and streams (outside South Florida) are virtually identical to those in EPA’s 2010 rule. FDEP also has adopted additional biological and chemical indicators that are used to identify and prevent nutrient pollution in streams and to protect sensitive downstream waters. This combination of numeric limits with biological indicators was used in the Santa Fe River. Although the river met the numeric limits, FDEP was able to use biological information to determine that it was impaired and needed restoration. FDEP’s rules are intended to improve water quality and protect public health, aquatic life and the long-term recreational uses of Florida’s waters, which are a critical part of the state’s economy.

The Clean Water Act (CWA) envisions states being primarily responsible for protecting water quality, and EPA fully supports Florida’s efforts to implement its own water quality standards. However, in accordance with a 2009 consent decree with the Florida Wildlife Federation—and because the state’s rules do not cover certain waters—EPA is also proposing two federal nutrient rules. One rule proposes numeric limits on the amount of nutrient pollution allowed in Florida’s estuaries and coastal waters, as well as streams in South Florida, which were not addressed in Florida’s rules. The other clarifies some provisions in the 2010 rule EPA promulgated establishing numeric limits on the amount of nutrient pollution allowed in Florida’s inland waters. These provisions were remanded to EPA for further action by the District Court.

EPA welcomes public comment on its proposed rules and will host public information sessions in Tampa on January 17-18, 2013, along with web-based public hearings on January 22-24, 2013, to gather input. While EPA must finalize the remanded portions of Florida’s inland waters rule by August 31, 2013 and the coastal waters rule by September 30, 2013, the Agency is prepared to withdraw, or not move forward with its federal rules for any waters that become covered by state law that meets the requirements of the Clean Water Act. Florida recently adopted nutrient rules for Panhandle estuaries, and EPA expects FDEP will soon submit the new rules for EPA’s formal review and approval under the Clean Water Act.

U.S. EPA News

Pacific scheme violates international rules

Geoengineering with bloom : high concentrations of chlorophyll in the Eastern Gulf of Alaska
Yellow and brown colours show relatively high concentrations of chlorophyll in August 2012, after iron sulphate was dumped into the Pacific Ocean as part of a controversial geoengineering scheme. Photograph: Giovanni/Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center/NASA

A controversial American businessman dumped around 100 tonnes of iron sulphate into the Pacific Ocean as part of a geoengineering scheme off the west coast of Canada in July, a Guardian investigation can reveal.

Lawyers, environmentalists and civil society groups are calling it a “blatant violation” of two international moratoria and the news is likely to spark outrage at a United Nations environmental summit taking place in India this week.

Satellite images appear to confirm the claim by Californian Russ George that the iron has spawned an artificial plankton bloom as large as 10,000 square kilometres. The intention is for the plankton to absorb carbon dioxide and then sink to the ocean bed – a geoengineering technique known as ocean fertilisation that he hopes will net lucrative carbon credits.

George is the former chief executive of Planktos Inc, whose previous failed efforts to conduct large-scale commercial dumps near the Galapagos and Canary Islands led to his vessels being barred from ports by the Spanish and Ecuadorean governments. The US Environmental Protection Agency warned him that flying a US flag for his Galapagos project would violate US laws, and his activities are credited in part to the passing of international moratoria at the United Nations limiting ocean fertilisation experiments

Scientists are debating whether iron fertilisation can lock carbon into the deep ocean over the long term, and have raised concerns that it can irreparably harm ocean ecosystems, produce toxic tides and lifeless waters, and worsen ocean acidification and global warming.

“It is difficult if not impossible to detect and describe important effects that we know might occur months or years later,” said John Cullen , an oceanographer at Dalhousie University. “Some possible effects, such as deep-water oxygen depletion and alteration of distant food webs, should rule out ocean manipulation. History is full of examples of ecological manipulations that backfired.”

George says his team of unidentified scientists has been monitoring the results of what may be the biggest ever geoengineering experiment with equipment loaned from US agencies like Nasa and the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration. He told the Guardian that it is the “most substantial ocean restoration project in history,” and has collected a “greater density and depth of scientific data than ever before”.

“We’ve gathered data targeting all the possible fears that have been raised [about ocean fertilisation],” George said. “And the news is good news, all around, for the planet.”

The dump took place from a fishing boat in an eddy 200 nautical miles west of the islands of Haida Gwaii, one of the world’s most celebrated, diverse ecosystems, where George convinced the local council of an indigenous village to establish the Haida Salmon Restoration Corporation to channel more than $ 1m of its own funds into the project.

The president of the Haida nation, Guujaaw, said the village was told the dump would environmentally benefit the ocean, which is crucial to their livelihood and culture.

“The village people voted to support what they were told was a ‘salmon enhancement project’ and would not have agreed if they had been told of any potential negative effects or that it was in breach of an international convention,” Guujaaw said.

International legal experts say George’s project has contravened the UN’s convention on biological diversity (CBD) and London convention on the dumping of wastes at sea, which both prohibit for-profit ocean fertilisation activities.

“It appears to be a blatant violation of two international resolutions,” said Kristina M Gjerde, a senior high seas adviser for the International Union for Conservation of Nature. “Even the placement of iron particles into the ocean, whether for carbon sequestration or fish replenishment, should not take place, unless it is assessed and found to be legitimate scientific research without commercial motivation. This does not appear to even have had the guise of legitimate scientific research.”

George told the Guardian that the two moratoria are a “mythology” and do not apply to his project.

The parties to the UN CBD are currently meeting in Hyderabad, India, where the governments of Bolivia, the Philippines and African nations as well as indigenous peoples are calling for the current moratorium to be upgraded to a comprehensive test ban of geoengineering that includes enforcement mechanisms.

“If rogue geoengineer Russ George really has misled this indigenous community, and dumped iron into their waters, we hope to see swift legal response to his behavior and strong action taken to the heights of the Canadian and US governments,” said Silvia Ribeiro of the international technology watchdog ETC Group, which first discovered the existence of the scheme. “It is now more urgent than ever that governments unequivocally ban such open-air geoengineering experiments. They are a dangerous distraction providing governments and industry with an excuse to avoid reducing fossil fuel emissions.”

Environment news, comment and analysis from the Guardian | guardian.co.uk

New ACCCE Analysis Shows EPA Rules to Shut Down 16 Coal Units in Virginia

WASHINGTON–()–Results of a new analysis show that 16 coal-based electric generating units in Virginia are scheduled to be shut down due, at least in part, to regulations issued by the Environmental Protection Agency. The closures in Virginia represent more than 2,500 megawatts of electric generating capacity.

“We appreciate the House standing up for America’s coal industry, and the families and businesses that rely on affordable electricity that coal continues to provide.”

The new analysis released today by the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (ACCCE) shows 204 closing coal units nationally are spread across 25 states and represent 31,000 megawatts of electric generating capacity. The national closures are equivalent to shutting down the entire electricity supply of Ohio. So far, the total number of retirements nationwide is triple the amount of retirements that the EPA had predicted would be caused by its regulations.

“This is further evidence that EPA is waging a war on coal, and a war on affordable electricity prices and jobs. EPA continues to ignore the damage that its new regulations are causing to the U.S. economy and to states that depend on coal for jobs and affordable electricity,” said Mike Duncan, president and CEO of ACCCE.

According to the analysis, the states with the most coal-electric generating capacity being prematurely closed are Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Virginia and North Carolina. These five states combined have 103 coal units scheduled to shutter, representing almost 18,000 megawatts. Other hard hit states include Indiana, Colorado and Iowa.

This week, the U.S. House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on the “Stop the War on Coal Act of 2012,” H.R. 3409. The act combines several existing bills that have received bipartisan support in the House and would ensure that EPA regulations are sensible.

“Our country needs sound energy and environmental policies, and this bill is a critical step to getting us back on the right track,” said Duncan. “We appreciate the House standing up for America’s coal industry, and the families and businesses that rely on affordable electricity that coal continues to provide.”

About ACCCE

The American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (ACCCE) is a non-profit, non-partisan partnership of companies involved in producing electricity from coal. ACCCE supports energy policies that balance coal’s vital role in meeting our country’s growing need for affordable and reliable electricity with the need to protect the environment. ACCCE also advocates for the development and deployment of advanced clean coal technologies that will produce electricity with near-zero emissions. For more information, visit www.cleancoalusa.org or www.americaspower.org.

Business Wire Environment News

Harper Government Moves Forward on Tough Rules for Coal-Fired Electricity Sector

Harper Government Moves Forward on Tough Rules for Coal-Fired Electricity Sector. SASKATOON, Sask. — September 5, 2012 — Canada’s Environment Minister, the Honourable Peter Kent, today announced final regulations for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from coal-fired electricity generation.
News Releases

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to vote on landmark rules

16th August 2012

U.S. regulator to vote on two crucial rules 

On 22nd August the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will vote on two landmark provisions contained within the July 2010 Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. 

The Conflict Minerals Provision (Section 1502)

Section 1502 of the Dodd Frank Act seeks to cut funding to warring parties in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) by requiring U.S. listed companies to determine whether their minerals purchases are benefiting armed groups. The law requires firms using tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold from DRC and neighbouring countries to carry out due diligence on their supply chains, to publicly report their findings annually to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and to have these reports independently audited.

Click here for more information on 1502.

The Extractive Industry Transparency Provision (Section 1504)

Section 1504 of the Dodd Frank Act will require US listed oil, gas and mining companies to disclose what they pay to governments.  The provision requires disclosure of payments at the country and project level.  The rules will shine a light on billions of dollars in payments to governments from oil, gas and mining companies to end the secrecy which enables corrupt government officials to siphon off or misappropriate natural resource revenues. Information on payments will give citizens more power to track the money being paid to governments in resource-rich countries to combat oil and mineral sector corruption. 

Click here for more information on 1504.