Posts Tagged ‘Reserve’

Climate Action Reserve Approved to Register Offset Projects for California’s Cap-and-Trade Program

LOS ANGELES–()–The Climate Action Reserve, the nation’s premier carbon offset registry,
earned approval from the California Air Resources Board (ARB) to serve
the state’s groundbreaking Cap-and-Trade Program as an Offset Project
Registry. As an approved registry, the Reserve is officially approved to
issue registry offset credits under ARB compliance offset protocols that
may then be transitioned into ARB compliance offset credits and used
under the state Cap-and-Trade Program. With extensive experience and
expertise in administering carbon offset projects under similar
voluntary protocols it developed, the Climate Action Reserve is
well-prepared and well-qualified to advance the environmental integrity,
efficiency and effectiveness of California’s compliance offset program.

“Since its inception the
Reserve has established market confidence in the quality of its
protocols and offsets, and has allowed the public to see the real
environmental benefit from offset projects.”

“ARB’s authorization of the Reserve as an official offset registry marks
an important step in the development of California’s compliance offset
program,” said Governor Gray Davis, who in 2001 signed into California
state law the enabling legislation to create the Reserve’s legacy
program. “The Reserve has long served the voluntary carbon market as a
trusted offset program that achieves real, immediate and cost-effective
solutions to curb emissions. They will bring the same rigor,
transparency and integrity to build confidence and trust in the
California carbon market.”

ARB’s four compliance offset protocols, which were adapted from Reserve
standards, provide regulatory standards for emissions reductions in
forests, urban forests, ozone depleting substances and livestock methane
projects from throughout the United States. Regulated facilities under
California’s Cap-and-Trade Program may use ARB-issued compliance offset
credits from emissions reduction projects to meet up to 8 percent of
their total reported emissions.

“As the first and only offset registry whose standards have been adopted
by the ARB, the Climate Action Reserve is uniquely suited to support
California’s compliance offset program,” stated Linda Adams, Chair of
the Climate Action Reserve Board of Directors. “Since its inception the
Reserve has established market confidence in the quality of its
protocols and offsets, and has allowed the public to see the real
environmental benefit from offset projects.”

The Reserve began informally accepting submissions for GHG emissions
reduction projects under ARB’s offset protocols while it underwent the
application process to become an approved registry. The Reserve supports
registration of projects by reviewing project documents, providing
guidance to offset project operators and providing supplemental
oversight to independent verification bodies in addition to ARB’s
oversight. With its years of experience in administering the original
protocols, the Reserve has the technical expertise and the sound
judgment to minimize risk associated with offset projects.

The first project listed with the Reserve using an ARB compliance offset
protocol is the Dairyland Digester livestock project. Dairy operations
release methane, a greenhouse gas that is 20 times more powerful at
trapping heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. The ARB Livestock
Protocol provides regulatory standards for the installation of a manure
biogas control system that collects and destroys methane gas.

The Climate Action Reserve is a private nonprofit organization
representing international interests in addressing climate change and
bringing together participants from the government, environment and
business sectors. As the premier carbon offset registry in North
America, it works to ensure environmental benefit, integrity and
transparency in the carbon market. It establishes high quality standards
for quantifying and verifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction
projects, oversees independent third-party verification bodies, issues
carbon credits generated from such projects and tracks the transaction
of credits over time in a transparent, publicly-accessible system. By
ensuring that GHG reduction projects provide true environmental benefit
and earn high quality offsets, the Climate Action Reserve is creating a
trusted and valuable commodity and bringing credibility and efficiency
to the carbon market. For more information, please visit www.climateactionreserve.org.

Business Wire Environment News

Australia Creates World’s Largest Marine Reserve

Australia has created the largest area of marine reserves protected under law, about the size of Western Europe.

The decision will prevent commercial fishing and mining for fossil fuels in ocean spanning 2.3 million square kilometers (888,035 square miles). Tony Burke, Environment Minister said the move would help encourage threatened sea life.

“We don’t want people to only know the magnificence of their oceans through aquariums or by watching ‘Finding Nemo’,” he said.

The safeguarded areas include coral reefs off the southwest of Australia, and the Coral Sea around the north Queensland coast. The new reserves will span between Perth Canyon and Kangaroo Island in the south, and to the Coral Sea surrounding the Great Barrier Reef in the north.

Australia’s oceans are home to tuna, sharks, deep-sea canyons and isolated coral reefs. Although some activities are limited in sensitive areas, tourism, shipping and diving are still permitted.

The decision has naturally angered those in the commercial fishing industry, along with recreational fishers who are also restricted. According to the Australian Marine Alliance, 36,000 jobs would be lost as a result.

Burke said the government would reimburse commercial fishers AU$ 100 million ($ 103.28 million) to compensate for their lost access, and the new reserves would only damage about 1% of the country’s commercial fishing.

He added that recreational fishers shouldn’t be too adversely affected, as many of the protected parks were way offshore and out of range for them to access.

Nevertheless, fishing supporters were aggravated by the decision. Allan Hansard, recreational fishing foundation director said, “The government is discriminating against recreational fishers by allowing divers, tourist operators, container ships and even defense force activities into marine parks, but banning fishing families from catching a fish.”

Conservation groups are pleased with the move, adding that even more could be done to protect Australia’s seas.

The country’s world-famous Great Barrier Reef will be considered for world heritage site status within the next year, according to a United Nations report from earlier in 2012.

Enviro News – News

Fight to save nature reserve from drug gangs

Maya Biosphere Reserve in Guatemala and Tikal National Park
The eastern half of the Maya Biosphere Reserve not only harbours much of Guatemala’s biodiversity, but it also includes historic Mayan sites like these temples, part of Tikal National Park and World Heritage Site. Photograph: Al Argueta/Alamy

The 200-foot summit of Temple IV in the ancient Maya city of Tikal provides a spectacular view of Central America’s largest expanse of intact rainforest. In the late afternoon, spider monkeys dangle from nearby branches, stretching to pick small fruits. The guttural barks of howler monkeys echo through the canopy — a lush green broken only by the occasional flash of lemon yellow from a swooping toucan.

This lowland forest is the heart of the Maya Biosphere Reserve of northern Guatemala, a 2.1 million-hectare (5.2 million-acre) sanctuary that covers 19 percent of the country and contains roughly 60 percent of its protected area. The UNESCO-designated biosphere reserve sustains a wide array of biodiversity, most notably the last remaining population of a key subspecies of scarlet macaw.

But this magnificent creature and others that inhabit the reserve — jaguars, pumas, Guatemalan black howler monkeys, Baird’s tapirs — are being pressured not just by the standard threats common to tropical regions, such as illegal logging, fires, and commercial hunting. Even more virulent forces are gnawing away at the Maya Biosphere Reserve, including Mexican drug cartels that cut into the forest to build airstrips to transport drugs, Salvadoran gangs that carve out huge cattle ranches to launder drug money, and Chinese organized crime groups moving their illegal logging network toward the reserve to supply Asian markets with prime tropical hardwoods.

As a result, this natural and cultural treasure — the heart of the Selva Maya, a forest spanning the borders of Guatemala, Mexico, and Belize — has in recent years effectively been cut in two. The western side, which includes two of the reserve’s five national parks and is bordered on the west and the north by Mexico, is under siege, according to Guatemalan park officials. The eastern part of the reserve, where Tikal rises above the jungle canopy and which borders Belize, is lush and intact.

“The story of the Maya Biosphere Reserve has increasingly become a tale of two reserves — one of conservation successes and one of failures,” says Roan McNab, director of the New York-based Wildlife Conservation Society’s (WCS) Guatemala program. McNab is a pivotal figure in a coalition of Guatemalan and foreign conservation groups battling to preserve the eastern half of the reserve and claw back some of the denuded lands of the western sector.

Much is at stake, as the reserve and the surrounding Selva Maya are the largest block of intact forest north of the Amazon Basin. The reserve supports 513 of Guatemala’s bird species (71 percent of the national total), 122 mammal species (64 percent), 95 reptile species (39 percent), and more than 80 species of neotropical migrant birds from North America. It enshrouds Tikal, a national park and World Heritage Site, and hundreds of other vestiges of Mayan civilization.

The international coalition struggling to preserve the heart of the reserve has enjoyed some important successes. Scarlet macaws are making a comeback thanks to intensive restoration efforts. The presence of the civilian government and military has grown. Prosecution of environmental crimes is up, albeit slightly. And community-based forest concessions have brought some rural Guatemalans sustainable income and empowered them in managing parts of the reserve.

“There’s a greater social awareness now of the importance of preserving environmental stability,” says Rolman Hernandez, director of the Petén region of Consejo Nacional de Areas Protegidas (CONAP), the Guatemalan park service. The reserve covers more than half of the Petén, the largest and northernmost of Guatemala’s 22 departments, or provinces.

The region that became the Maya Biosphere Reserve was once a vast mix of lowland rainforest, wetlands, lagoons, lakes, rivers, and mangrove forests. As many as 2 million people lived here at the peak of Mayan civilization, around 800 A.D., archeologists estimate. Then came the Mayan decline and Spanish conquest.

Until the 1960s, the region consisted of a few isolated forest villages. Then roads, built mainly to access oil and timber, opened the the area to illegal colonization and slash-and-burn agriculture. The reserve was created in 1990 to help control deforestation, but CONAP, financially strapped and often overruled by government officials friendly to the ranchers, has been hampered in its attempts to control the wave of destruction, McNab and others say. Today the human population is 118,000, with most living in poverty.

Criminal activity in the area began to intensify a decade ago, further accelerating the destruction of the western half of the reserve. An important factor is that northern Guatemala is ideally situated to refuel drug aircraft flying from South America and transfer narcotics to trucks for the easy drive to Mexico. The cartels operated in a “climate of impunity” since the army and police lacked the power to take them on, McNab says. The ranchers built dozens of airstrips, including one dubbed the “international airport,” which had three runways and more than a dozen abandoned aircraft. The result was a loss of 40,000 hectares of forest.

Guatemalans have developed a new term for what’s happening in the region: narcoganaderia, a combination of the Spanish words for drugs and cattle ranching. The cartels launder drug money by investing in cattle production and reaping profits from cattle sales in Mexican markets.

CONAP officials say evidence of the work of Chinese-backed criminal groups lies in the yard behind the agency’s Petén headquarters, in San Benito. The yard is crowded with timber and confiscated vehicles. Victor Penados, CONAP’s coordinator of control and vigilance for the reserve, points to a pile of rosewood confiscated from suppliers to Chinese criminal groups. The wood comes from one of several recent timber-smuggling busts by the government reported in national news media. This pile, confiscated from a truck delivering the wood to the Caribbean seaport of Puerto San Tomas de Castillo for shipment to China, has a market value of $ 125,000, Penados estimates.

Operatives with Chinese criminal cartels have been conducting illegal logging just south of the reserve, according to CONAP. McNab fears it won’t be long before the Chinese-backed groups start cutting inside the reserve itself and then turn to intensive jaguar poaching for body parts to serve a Chinese market that is already driving Asian big cats toward extinction.

This conservation drama is playing out under extreme conditions. CONAP and WCS staffers have been threatened many times. Some have been taken hostage, while others have had to “disappear” for several weeks after raids to reclaim illegally acquired ranchland. McNab himself was held at gunpoint by two looters of a Mayan ruin deep in the jungle. I was accompanied into the forest with as many as five armed security guards as we traveled near cartel ranches. Always in the back of my mind were the nation’s poverty, corruption, history of dictatorship, lawlessness, and 36-year civil war, which ended in 1996.

The influence of illegal logging and ranching in the reserve is evident in a series of three CONAP land-use maps showing a wave of fires and land clearing that gobbled up large green swaths of forest from 2000 to 2011, especially in the western section. McNab warns that if law enforcement does not improve, the reserve faces a “chain of falling dominoes threatening to sweep eastward all the way to Guatemala’s border with Belize.”

Nowhere is the tale of two reserves more visible than at the Guacamayas Biological Station in Laguna del Tigre National Park. To the south, across the Rio San Pedro and beyond, stretches a vast plain of ranchland, the raw result of deforestation. To the north, the rainforest canopy rolls untattered all the way to the border with Mexico. In 2008, scientists discovered a 1,100-hectare clear-cut smack in the middle of that expanse. It turned out to be a large cattle ranch linked to a Salvadoran gang involved in drug trafficking.

Such forest destruction has in recent decades reduced by 75 percent the habitat of the region’s scarlet macaws, a subspecies of the scarlet macaws found farther south in Latin America and the last remaining macaws in the wild in Guatemala. By 2000, scarlet macaws had nearly been extirpated in the reserve. A 2003 WCS study estimated that the population, mostly centered in the forest to the east of Laguna del Tigre park, had dropped to 200 birds. That year, the researchers monitored 15 nests, but only one chick successfully fledged.

But a program of predator control, environmental education in local schools, and hand-rearing by veterinarians brought the number of successful macaw fledglings to 29 in 2011 and 49 for this year’s nesting season. Says McNab, “We feel pretty good about adding that number of birds to the population. That’s big in terms of saving the species.”

To halt continuing deforestation, CONAP and its allies have established what they call “the Shield” — a lattice of trails running along the eastern border of Laguna del Tigre park, anchored by three major bases for patrols by CONAP, the army, national police, and others. Patrols and arrests have risen steadily over the past four years.

If the success or failure of the Shield will determine whether the western front of the reserve holds, what happens in villages like Uaxactún will decide whether the eastern part will avoid destruction from within.

Uaxactún, population 280, is one of 14 villages awarded government concessions more than a decade ago as part of an experiment in community-based forest management. The concessions, covering nearly one-fourth of the reserve, require residents to protect the forest ecosystem
and manage its wood and other resources sustainably.

The villagers must refrain from poaching, intensive logging, slash-and-burn farming, and other unsustainable practices, as well as patrol for and report any such illegal activity. In return, CONAP, WCS, and other groups provide technical and financial support for forest-product ventures. Dozens of residents now work in sustainable harvesting of timber, date palm fronds, chicle for chewing gum, and other non-timber products from the forest. Others work in the village sawmill and woodworking shop.

Village leaders say the concession is working well. But not all the concessions have been so successful, according to a study published in March in the journal Forest Ecology and Management. Among reasons for the problems were limited funding, the low CONAP budget, pressure from illegal ranching, and land speculation.

The effort in the village of Cruce a la Colorada was one of the failures. In 2010, disputes between ranchers and concession managers became so heated that concession members received death threats. A community leader was assassinated. In the ensuing climate of fear, the project collapsed.

But the conservation groups remain hopeful.

“You can grapple with these governance issues and you can have success,” McNab says. “It takes an integrated strategy working with a huge suite of partners, but it can be done.”

Environment news, comment and analysis from the Guardian | guardian.co.uk

Conservationists condemn exile of Chagossians for marine reserve

Chagos archipelo : An aerial view of Diego Garcia Islands in the Indian ocean
An aerial view of Diego Garcia Islands, part of the Chagos archipelago. Photograph: John Parker/Alamy

Leading conservation groups have condemned the government’s “huge violation” of the rights of thousands of exiled Chagossian islanders who cannot return to their Indian ocean coral islands because they have been surrounded by the world’s largest marine nature reserve.

Proposals by the foreign secretary David Miliband Britain in 2008 for the creation of a giant 1m ha marine protection zone closed to all fishing around the almost pristine tropical archipelago were backed enthusiastically by nine of the world’s major green groups, including Kew Gardens, the RSPB, Greenpeace, the Pew Environment group, the Zoological Society of London and the Marine Conservation Society. Together they asked supporters to back the Foreign Office proposal for the reserve and raised over 275,000 signatures. The park was finally established in 2010.

But diplomatic cables published by WikiLeaks in 2011 suggested that Britain and the US lured the environment groups with the offer of the reserve and then used its ban on fishing to ensure that no Chagossian would ever be able to live within hundreds of miles of Diego Garcia. This, the largest island in the Chagos archipelago, was cleared by Britain of 1,500 native people in 1964 when it leased the island to the US for a massive military base.

Even if the Chagossians won the legal right to return, they might be unable to live on the islands if they were not allowed to fish.

The apparent hoodwinking of the conservationists seemed to be confirmed by the US diplomatic cable dated May 2009. A British Foreign Office official told the US government that the decision to set up the reserve would “effectively put paid to resettlement claims of the archipelago’s former residents”.

In further revelations this month, British archives disclosed how the Foreign Office noted in 1966: “The object of the exercise is to get some rocks which will remain ours […] there will be no indigenous population except seagulls”.

But some conservation groups who strongly opposed people living on Chagos islands in 2009 now say that they would not object to the islanders returning. “We have no opposition to the return of the Chagossians. We would support this as much as the reserve itself. If there were a return we would support it. I do not think anyone in the coalition … would oppose a return. I don’t think the environment network [of the nine groups] would oppose that in any way,” said Marine Conservation Society biodiversity chief, Peter Richardson.

Greenpeace strengthened calls for the human rights of the Chagossians to be respected. “The Chagossian people have suffered, and continue to suffer, a huge violation of their human rights. It is completely within the powers of the UK government to decide to right the historic wrong and agree for the right of the return to the Chagossian people and commit to the development of a joint management plan for the marine reserve than includes the zoning of some areas to enable sustainable subsistence fishing,” said Kumi Naidoo, executive director of Greenpeace International, at the Oxford Amnesty Lectures this month.

The TV presenter and conservationist Ben Fogle, one of a few people to have illegally visited the Chagossian islands in the past few years, said he hoped to appeal directly to the US secretary of state, Hilary Clinton. “We fight tooth and nail to save animals from extinction. Do we not owe it to our own people? We have already let the dodo die out, we can’t and mustn’t let this happen to a people and their culture.”

In an article for the Guardian, he says: “I am ashamed to be British. It is a story of deceit and tragedy that has been described by some as the darkest day in British overseas policy. It has shaken my very principles on conservation and democracy. It is a story of deceit that has left thousands of British refugees living in misery for the past 40 years, exiled from their island home by a conniving and unrepentant government.”

The European court of human rights is expected to rule by July on whether the islanders have a right to return and a separate judicial review will rule on whether the British government conducted a proper consultation for the reserve, having not shown it to many Chagossians in Mauritius and elsewhere. An international tribunal will also rule, possibly in 2013, on whether Britain had the sovereign right to declare the marine reserve.

“We have always recognised the terrible suffering of the Chagossians as a result of the UK government . I am not saying that they should not have the right to return. When the situation changes, the marine reserve should be reassessed,” said Jonathan Hall, overseas territory officer of the RSPB.

Other conservation groups told the Guardian they were “neutral” on the question of whether the Chagossians should return. In a statement, the Linnean society said: “The Chagossians’ return and conservation are not necessarily exclusive. [But] it’s a very pristine area. I can see people would say ‘they were used’ [but] looked at from a biodiversity perspective, we don’t know much about this amazing place. It may have been convenient for government, but [I do not think] we were being used. We have a golden opportunity to preserve and observe,” said Elizabeth Rollinson, secretary of the Linnean Society.

“We support conservation initiatives aiming to protect the rich and important biodiversity found in the Chagos archipelago, including Kew’s work in plant conservation in the region and the creation of the Chagos Marine Reserve.” said Prof Stephen Hopper, director of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

“Whatever the outcome of the court case we will support the Chagossians. If they are given the right to return [by the courts] we will do our best to provide them with technical expertise. We would be very happy to work with them,” said Heather Koldewey, head of global programmes at the Zoological Society of London.

But she added: “People have an impact. It entirely depends on the scale of the people [their return] and what they do. Chagos represents what our oceans should look like. It’s important scientifically. It is an extraordinary place.”

David Snoxell, former high commissioner to Mauritius, has appealed to the Foreign Office to negotiate a political solution: “A zone for sustainable fishing by Chagossians should have been designated just as the marine protected area allows the 4,000 personnel on the US base to continue their leisure fishing activities. Two years on it has hardly progressed beyond a paper park and cannot do so until the court cases are settled.

“The Foreign Office should come out of their bunker and negotiate a political compromise. It is a waste of tax payers’ money that could have gone into conservation and helping those Chagossians who want to return.

“There is nothing to stop FCO modifying the full no-take area. It would not damage the marine protection area.”

Environment news, comment and analysis from the Guardian | guardian.co.uk

SMA Alliance Partners With IGE on $400,000,000 Gold Reserve Mine

SOURCE: SMA Alliance, Inc.

NASHVILLE, TN–(Marketwire – Feb 22, 2012) – SMA Alliance (PINKSHEETS: SMAA) is pleased to announce that an exclusive contract has been signed with International Gold Extraction Corporation (IGE). An estimated $ 400 million dollars in Gold reserves and other precious metals are what multiple industry verifiable tests have shown on the properties. International Gold Extraction Corp entered into an L.O.I for a joint venture in Northern Canada and chose this as a vital program to work in accordance with SMA Alliance. The geological tests will be available for the investing public over the next thirty days as the companies release this data. Weather permitting; mining for the gold and other precious metals is set to begin by early May 2012.

International Gold Extraction Corp. (IGE) is teaming up with the proven lead generation technology offered by SMA Alliance, Inc in an effort to drive international attention to their website, as well as attracting different financial institutions to the opportunities that International Gold Extraction Corp. is working towards. As mentioned in previous public statements, this allows SMA Alliance an introduction into the finance vertical. Continued gains in market share as well as shareholder equity are the driving force of SMA Alliance, Inc.

Safe Harbor Statement:

This news release includes forward-looking statements pertaining to future anticipated projected plans, performance and developments, intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements on this news release that are not statements of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally can be identified by phrases such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,”"foresees,” “forecasts,” “estimates,” “intends,” or other words or phrases of similar import. Similarly, statements in this news release that describe the Company’s business strategy, outlook, objectives, plans, intentions or goals also are forward-looking statements. All such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements.

Marketwire – Environment

Press release on the public launch of the economic valuation report and a documentary about Mabira Forest Reserve, on 6th October 2011

Press release on the public launch of the economic valuation report and a documentary about Mabira Forest Reserve, on 6th October 2011

photo credit: ugandansatheart.org

1.Following the proposal to give away 7100 ha of Mabira Central Forest Reserve to Mehta Group of Companies for sugar growing in 2005, NatureUganda subsequently in 2007 conducted a study through independent consultants on the economic valuation of Mabira Central Forest reserve.

2.The results of the study have been published in a report “Economic Valuation of the proposed degazettement of Mabira Central Forest Reserve”.

3.The results indicated that:

a.While SCOUL has stated the potential benefits of its plan – on which it bases its request for allocation of forest reserve lands – these benefits have neither been quantified nor clarified. The corporation says the annual stream of net benefits of sugarcane growing represent a better land use option than the conservation of the Mabira reserve as it exists now. The report calculates net benefits of US$ 3.6 million per year from sugarcane as opposed to US$ 1.1 million per year from conservation.

b.Such a calculation by the corporation is based only on a short-term gain as the economic life of a sugarcane stand is at the most five years. When the present value of the standing crop of timber alone (excluding other uses) was compared to the present value of net benefits from sugarcane growing, conservation of the forest yielded a greater long-term benefit than sugarcane. When the value of ecological services was added to that of the standing crop of timber, conserving the forest reserve as it exists registered a far higher net present value of US$ 45.1 million, compared with US$ 29.9 million from sugarcane growing.

c.Again, while the economic life of the natural tropical forest stand can stretch over thousands of years, the economic life of a sugarcane stand is economically optimal and maintained for about 5 years;

d.The value of timber growing stock (only trees of 40cm diameter and above) was estimated at US$ 35.2 million compared to present value of annual stream of net benefits from sugarcane growing of US$ 29.9 million, over a similar life-time of 60 years;

e.The report estimates the value of standing crop of timber in the 7100ha at US$ 35.2m which invalidates the falsehood that the area proposed for sugarcane growing does not have valuable timber trees.

f.When the value of ecological services was added to that of the standing crop of timber, conservation registers a net present value of US$ 45.1 million, an amount much more superior than sugarcane growing of US$ 29.9 million. In other words, converting a part of Mabira CFR for sugarcane growing will not only cause ecological disturbance of the whole Mabira forest but would incur a net loss of US$ 15.2 million to Ugandans;

g.And on the other hand, if the useful life of the sugarcane plantation is restricted to the five-year ratoon the cane has a present value of US$ 12.3 million, which is a shortfall of US$ 32.8 million to the present value of conserving the forest.

4.Study also indicates that for the equivalent of 7100 ha, SCOUL could purchase land from private sources at a cheaper cost (US$ 10.6 million), an amount less than the compensation value (US$ 45.1) Mabira Forest would require.

5.During the same period, an aerial trip funded by European Union was taken to determine the status of the forest especially areas that were considered degraded. This has been compiled into a 20 minute documentary, now completed for public viewing.

6.The documentary is based on an aerial trip over the forest to locate degraded areas based on the investor’s proposal that he will use only the degraded part of the forest. The aerial view did not confirm or locate any degraded area. This has been confirmed by the National Forestry Authority ground staff that there are no degraded parts of the forest. Although there used to be encroached parts of the forest in 1980s, all of them have been restored over the last two decades and the satellite images of 2010 indicate a fully recovered forest canopy.

7.The publication of the two reports (economic evaluation report and the documentary) indicating that;
a.the conservation value is far more superior to the sugarcane growing and
b.the video evidence that there are no degraded forest areas in Mabira provide enough information that the proposal to give away a natural forest for sugarcane growing was a careless proposal and should be set aside.

8.The results from the report and documentary also compliment legal fact that the current legal dispensation does not permit the give away of any part of a forest or wildlife protected area as per the constitution Art 237, Land Act section 42, Wildlife Act or the National Forestry and Tree planting Act.

9.Therefore, based on the legal facts, economic evaluation report, all other reports produced, the video documentary and Ugandans disproval of the proposal gives evidence that;
1.SCOUL should stay clear and away from Mabira Forest Reserve
2.Government should decline to grant SCOUL its request for 7,100ha of Mabira Forest Reserve and any other such future requests
3.SCOUL and Mehta listen to the voices of the people of Uganda and how dearly they hold these forests, and withdraw from such ‘corporate irresponsibility”
4. Uganda is indeed ‘gifted by nature’ and it must not be those that are entrusted with the protection of this gift that will instead lead to its destruction.

For more information contact:
NatureUganda, the East Africa Natural History Society
Tufneil Drive Plot 83 Kamwokya, P. O. Box 27034, Kampala
Tel: +256 414 540719 Fax: +256 414 533528 Mob: +256 772 522727
e-mail: [email protected]
website: www.natureuganda.org

Related posts:

  1. Fears in Uganda for Mabira as sugar company renews its demands Mabira Forest is once again threatened by proposals to degazette almost a quarter of its…
  2. Forest & Bird welcomes new marine reserve, but more needed… Forest & Bird (BirdLife in New Zealand) said today it welcomed the upcoming official opening…
  3. Reefs and Mangroves Essential for Economic Growth in Dominican Republic The degradation of coastal ecosystems, such as coral reefs and mangroves, could cost the tourism…

This post was written by:

BirdLife Africa – who has written 30 posts on BirdLife Community.

The BirdLife Africa Partnership currently operates in 23 African countries: Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cote d’Ivoire, Djibouti, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Nigeria, Rwanda, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

Natural England: Thriving colonies of antlions discovered in Norfolk nature reserve


17 October 2011

Latest survey confirms Holkham as only the second breeding area in Britain for rare insect predator

Staff at Natural England’s Holkham National Nature Reserve have discovered what is thought to be only the second established breeding area in Britain for the mysterious yet savage antlion, an insect whose larvae excavate cone-like pits and lurk in wait for other insect prey. And its numbers on site appear to be increasing.

There had been reports of antlions skulking in the sandy ground beneath the Reserve’s pine woods since 2005, but there was uncertainty about the exact species and numbers involved. In 2008, Reserve staff undertook a full survey of the site to identify the species and determine the size and distribution of any population. This survey discovered just over 700 larval pits and confirmed the species as Euroleon nostras, but the scarcity of this insect in the UK meant there was always the chance this could be temporary colonisation. This year a further survey was carried out and found no fewer than 1,905 larval pits, confirming not only that the colony was still present but had almost trebled in size.

Although the adults look like small dragonflies, antlions are members of the lacewing family and are chiefly known for their ferocious young. The larvae’s prey includes ants, woodlice and other small invertebrates. Any insect unlucky enough to wander over the rim of the cone shaped burrow finds itself sliding inexorably down the steeply angled, shifting sand. At the bottom it is seized in the ant-lion’s huge jaws and sucked dry. The larvae live like this for two years before pupating into flying adults in late summer. Like other lacewings, the adults lead much briefer lives than their young – less than a month.

Holkham NNR is such a suitable site for the antlion because it has open banks of sand for the larval pits, abundant prey and pine trees, where the adults mate.

Natural England’s Senior Reserve Manager, Michael Rooney said “We’re really pleased with what the two surveys revealed: that the antlions are thriving at Holkham, with a sizeable population spreading through the pine woodland. It will be interesting to see what will migrate north to Holkham next.”

The only other known breeding area for the very rare antlion is the Suffolk Sandlings and the confirmation of an established breeding area in Holkham is another great success for the Reserve, which also hosts Britain’s only breeding spoonbill colony.

ENDS

Notes to editors

About antlions

Euroleon nostras is a species of antlion found over most of Europe, but is extremely rare in Britain. Adults may reach up to 30 mm long, with a wingspan of 70 mm, and larvae are around 10mm. The larvae require dry sandy soil to dig their pits, close to vertical sandy ledges that help adults emerge. Larval ant-lions have such efficient digestion that they do not produce solid waste and therefore do not need an anus. Larvae exude only liquid waste; the small amount of solid waste that may build up is excreted by newly emerged adults. Antlions remain in their larval stage for two years before pupating. Adults emerge from the pupa towards the end of July or in the first few days of August. They gather in a tall pine tree, and a number of males attempt to attract a single female. After mating, the female flies to the ground, where she lays her eggs in the sand. She has to be particularly wary of ant-lion larvae at this time, which are the main predators of female adults. Males live for up to 20 days, while females last a little longer, with an average life span of 24 days.

About Natural England

Natural England is the government’s independent adviser on the natural environment. Established in 2006 our work is focused on enhancing England’s wildlife and landscapes and maximising the benefits they bring to the public.

  • We establish and care for England’s main wildlife and geological sites, ensuring that over 4,000 National Nature Reserves and Sites of Special Scientific Interest are looked after and improved.

  • We work to ensure that England’s landscapes are effectively protected, designating England’s National Parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, and advising widely on their conservation.

  • We run Environmental Stewardship and other green farming schemes that deliver over £400 million a year to farmers and landowners, enabling them to enhance the natural environment across two thirds of England’s farmland.

  • We fund, manage, and provide scientific expertise for hundreds of conservation projects each year, improving the prospects for thousands of England’s species and habitats.

  • We promote access to the wider countryside, helping establish National Trails and coastal trails and ensuring that the public can enjoy and benefit from them.

For further information (media only), contact Lyndon Marquis on 0300 060 4236, 07786 277223, [email protected]


Full content generated by Get Full RSS.
info4local Subject Documents

Forest & Bird welcomes new marine reserve, but more needed…

Forest & Bird welcomes new marine reserve, but more needed…

picture by Seamoor / Flickr

Forest & Bird (BirdLife in New Zealand) said today it welcomed the upcoming official opening of the Tawharanui Marine Reserve north of Auckland but warned it was a drop in the ocean compared with what is needed to give adequate protection to New Zealand’s marine life.

Conservation Minister Kate Wilkinson is due to officially open the Tawharanui Marine Reserve north of Auckland on Sunday. The opening follows years of campaigning by the Auckland Regional Council (now the Auckland Council) and local groups for the reserve.

“There has been a no-take zone in the marine park at Tawharanui since 1981 – so there will be no practical change to the level of protection, but changing its status to a reserve will make the rules clearer to everyone,” Forest & Bird’s marine advocate Katrina Subedar said.

“We welcome the opening but we have to remember less than one percent of New Zealand’s marine environment within our exclusive economic zone (EEZ) is fully protected,” she said.

This compares with the Department of Conservation’s control of around a third of New Zealand’s landmass.

The release on Wednesday of proposed legislation to provide some environmental controls on mining and oil drilling in the waters of New Zealand’s EEZ and the wider continental shelf highlights the need for more areas to be given full protection as the pressure for development increases.

A marine reserve in the territorial waters around the Kermadec Islands must be expanded to ensure the protection of the stunning biodiversity in those waters, Katrina Subedar said.

Forest & Bird supports the creation of reserves because they give marine life a haven free from threats such as overfishing, damaging fishing methods and coastline development.

Nothing is allowed to be taken from marine reserves, although diving, swimming, boating, and any other activities that don’t harm marine life are permitted.

A survey released by WWF-New Zealand in May showed most New Zealanders don’t realise how little of our marine environment is protected and it also highlighted they want more protection. Forest & Bird believes at least 30 percent of should be fully protected to ensure the health of our marine environment.

The government has frozen the process to develop a network of marine protected areas around New Zealand, meaning that the vast majority our seas are not being systematically assessed for protection.

Forest & Bird is supporting an alternative Maori-led initiative to set up a rahui tapu at the Mimiwhangata Marine Park in Northland. A rahui tapu would create a no-take area.

This would be jointly administered by the local hapu and community, to restore fish and other life to the degraded waters around Mimiwhangata, Katrina Subedar said.

Related posts:

  1. Forest & Bird welcomes Government’s mining decision Independent conservation organisation Forest & Bird (BirdLife in New Zealand) welcomes the Government’s decision to…
  2. Forest & Bird delivers 4000 anti-mining submissions Forest & Bird (BirdLife in New Zealand) and other environmental organisations today handed over about…
  3. Forest & Bird calls for action over Hector’s dolphin deaths Forest & Bird (BirdLife Partner in New Zealand) calls on the Ministers of Fisheries and…

BirdLife Community

Minister visits RSPB reserve in mid Wales, home of this year’s BBC Springwatch

Both sites are examples of Wales’ success in conserving the natural environment to benefit communities and the economy.

The Minister said:

“I am delighted that for the past few weeks millions of television viewers have been enjoying the beauty of Wales by watching Springwatch. It was particularly exciting for viewers to be able to see the hatching of osprey chicks in the Dyfi valley for the first time in more than 400 years.

“Living in Wales means that you are never far from the countryside. The Welsh Government is developing plans to radically transform how we manage our diverse range of natural assets. The stewardship of our environment, countryside and seas needs to evolve so that these great natural resources continue to deliver environmental, social and economic benefits for everyone.

“Wildlife watching and green tourism makes a significant contribution to the Welsh economy. I would like to see the way we manage our natural environment evolving to encourage investment, create jobs and opportunities in rural areas. Activities such as mountain biking and watching Red Kites has helped raise Wales’ profile, and its attractiveness to visitors within Wales and beyond.

“The economic and social benefits arising from countryside recreation are now widely acknowledged. For example, the market for people taking walking holidays in Wales has been estimated to be worth over £500m per annum to the Welsh economy. This is likely to increase with the widely anticipated opening of the Wales Coast Path next year.

“Around 70,000 UK holidaymakers come to Wales every year with the main purpose of watching birds and wildlife, generating gross spending of between £15 and £20 million a year. In addition, many thousands visit for the day. This is a market with great potential for sustainable growth. It shows how much people value the natural environment and the fantastic experience we can provide in Wales.”

Environment and countryside

Rare dragonflies hatch at reserve following reintroduction

Dragonfly hatching out

An unknown species of dragonfly hatching. Photograph: Herbert Zettl/Corbis

Rare white-faced darter dragonflies have hatched at a UK nature reserve for the first time in years after they were reintroduced to a site in Cumbria.

The insects, which are only found in 10 sites in England, were reintroduced to Cumbria Wildlife Trust’s Foulshaw Moss nature reserve near Kendal, after 13 years of work to restore the moss habitat which suits the darter.

Aquatic larvae of the white-faced darter were collected from a donor site and introduced to pools at Foulshaw Moss in 2010 and 2011, with more batches to be added over the next few years.

It is hoped the colony, which is being established by the British Dragonfly Society and Cumbria Wildlife Trust with funding from Natural England, will then become self-sustaining. The first dragonflies began hatching in mid-May and will be on the wing over the next few weeks.

The species was lost to the lowland raised bog site – part of the Witherslack Mosses special area of conservation (SAC) – because of forest planting and drainage but restoration work on the moss since 1998 has recreated the conditions for the darter, Cumbria Wildlife Trust said.

Lowland bogs have been lost to forest planting, commercial peat-cutting for garden compost and a lack of good management.

John Dunbavin, reserves officer for the trust, said: “The restoration work at Foulshaw Moss has really played a significant part in conserving the many species that are only found on our lowland raised bogs.

We hope it will be another species that will be seen by future generation on the Witherslack Mosses for many years to come.”

David Smallshire, convener of the British Dragonfly Society’s conservation group, said: “The white-faced darter has been lost from half of its English sites in the past 50 years, so this initiative is an exciting opportunity to reverse that trend.”

He added that the project was only the second attempt ever to return a dragonfly to a former site.

Environment news, comment and analysis from the Guardian | guardian.co.uk