Posts Tagged ‘Policy’

Policy Internship

Applications are now open for our Policy Internship. Apply by 9 May 2013.

The British Ecological Society, the UK’s learned society for ecology, has a vacancy for a paid intern to work in the science policy team for two days a week for three months from the end of May 2013.

The Policy Intern will be paid the National Minimum Wage (£6.19 per hour).

The Policy Intern will help:

  • Monitor legislation and policy developments relevant to the science of ecology
  • Summarise policy developments for a general audience through the BES policy blog
  • Assist with the preparation of policy statements, briefing papers and responses to Government consultations
  • Assist with the organisation of policy meetings and events
  • Assist with administrative tasks

There is scope for refining the the tasks undertaken according to the experience and skills the intern would like to develop.

Qualifications and Skills:

  • Graduate (preferably in ecology, environmental science or a related subject)
  • Knowledge of ecological science
  • Knowledge of or interest in public policy
  • Excellent written communication skills
  • Excellent IT skills

Application is by CV (no more than two sides of A4) and covering letter (no more than one and a half sides of A4).

Please include in your covering letter your answer to the following question (in no more than 100 words): ‘What, in your view, is the major challenge facing the environment in the UK between now and 2020 and how can ecological science help to tackle this?’

Please submit your CV and letter via email to [email protected]

Please include details of when you would be available to start and on which days you would be available to work.

Interviews will take place on the morning of Tuesday 14 May 2013

BES Ecology & Policy Blog

The Common Agricultural Policy Reform: Direct payments to farmers – next steps

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Please submit your comments by 6 May 2013.
Environment and countryside

Written Statement – Common Agricultural Policy – The EU Agriculture Council Meeting Of 18-19 March 2013

[unable to retrieve full-text content]The CAP reform package endorsed by the Council reflects Welsh priorities in a number of respects.
Environment and countryside

Greening the Common Agricultural Policy: MEPs vote on environmental measures

As part of the wider EU budget review for the period 2014-2020, the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has been under scrutiny over the past two years. In its current state, the CAP accounts for 40% of the EU budget, and provides funding through two routes – Pillar One and Pillar Two. Reform of the CAP has been proposed for a number of years, with a view to moving away from its origins as a subsidy to a source of funding that is able to support sustainable farmland management. These changes have been developing for a long time, and proposals for the next period of CAP after 2013 were drawn up by the European Commission in October 2011. There have been a plethora of discussions and amendments across committees since, and final proposals were put before the full European Parliament for further debate and vote last Wednesday.

The debate and votes on the reforms encompassed all areas of the policy, from the allocation of payments to strengthening the bargaining position of farmers. The introduction of systems to ensure greater environmental protection and management, known as greening measures, were a key part of this. Currently, it is mainly Pillar Two that provides funding for environmental protection, but original proposals from the European Commission outlined the strengthening of Pillar One by introducing new green measures that farmers and land managers must meet.

The European Commission proposed in 2011 that 30% of direct payments could be dependent on farmers meeting criteria around crop diversity, grassland retention and ecological management. Original guidelines state that:

1) Cultivation on land over 3 hectares must be comprised of at least three different crops, with all covering 5-70%;
2) Permanent grassland or pasture should be maintained;
3) At least 7% of land must be managed as ‘Ecological Focus Areas’ (EFAs)

During the negotiations and debate, however, the specifics behind the message of greening the CAP were altered. To receive green funding, farmers still have to meet the three main criteria of crop diversity, maintenance of grassland, and management of land as EFAs, but the environmental guidelines have changed:

Crop diversity: Arable land of 10-30 hectares must be planted with at least two different crops covering 20-80% of the land. Land more than 30 hectares must be comprised of at least three crops covering 5-75% of land;
EFAs: During 2015, at least 3% of land over 10 hectares must be reserved for EFAs. From 2016, this will be expanded to 5%.

Although these are small changes on paper, these alterations have the potential to give considerably different outcomes to the original guidelines. The area of land dedicated to EFAs has been more than halved, a move which will have implications for the EU’s farmland wildlife. Farmland biodiversity has already seen declines over many years. As outlined in a previous blog, one group that has suffered as part of this are farmland birds. EFAs comprise areas such as hedgerows, ditches, ponds, or land left fallow. These can provide benefits to the greater ecological environment, especially in relation to environmental change. As recommended in the 2011 Natural Environment White Paper, for enhanced resilience and coherence of the country’s ecological network, sites need to be ‘more, bigger, better and joined’.

Although greening of the CAP does not look likely to be as ecologically rigorous as initially hoped, the creation of mandatory measures in Pillar One is still a step in the right direction. The area of EFAs remains open to review after 2016, and there will still be additional funding available through Pillar Two to farmers or land owners who want to further increase their sustainable management practices.

The debate and votes last week in the European Parliament were the first stage for the final negotiations for the CAP. European Council discussions are currently underway, and all three European bodies are due to come together to decide a final position on 11 April.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

BES Ecology & Policy Blog

Common Agricultural Policy deal struck

The UK has struck a deal to keep the Common Agricultural Policy on its path of reform, the Environment Secretary, Owen Paterson announced today.

In response to pressure from the UK, the Agriculture Council has provided reassurance that each of the four UK countries can continue to implement CAP regionally.

Environment Secretary, Owen Paterson said:

“A one size fits all approach to CAP just doesn’t work. England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales must be allowed the freedom to deliver outcomes tailored to their own circumstances.

“Working with all the Devolved Administrations and ensuring we spoke with one voice as part of these negotiations has been essential. I am delighted that we have successfully secured key changes to address concerns for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales on issues such as internal convergence and Areas of Natural Constraint. We will continue to represent the interests of the whole of the UK throughout discussions with European Parliament.”

The Council agreed to the Environment Secretary’s appeal for the UK to have freedom to design its own greening measures that will benefit the environment and UK farming.

At the start of the negotiations Member States were required to offer the European Commission’s greening measures in parallel with their own. Mr Paterson secured an important concession so that England can avoid the costs and confusion of parallel schemes by greening direct payments entirely through its own national scheme.

Mr Paterson made clear that the commission’s greening outcomes should be delivered through a simple system, achieving environmental benefits without imposing unnecessary costs on farmers and securing value for taxpayers. Today’s decision will give England the opportunity to achieve these objectives by building on the success of existing agri-environment schemes. Discussions with farmers can now begin on how greening should be designed, alongside the next Rural Development Programme.

Environment Secretary, Owen Paterson continued:

“The EU requires all farmers to deliver environmental benefits for 30% of their Pillar One CAP payments. The system that emerged from reforms under the previous Government was far too complex and the UK ended up being fined €550 million for not sticking to the rules. I’ve been absolutely clear that this must not happen again. The UK should have the freedom to have a simple, easy to manage system that builds on our well established arrangements. We’re now one very important step closer to being able to set our own greening measures, which work for farmers and use taxpayers’ money more effectively to deliver real environmental benefits.

The majority of Member States were content to allow farmers to be paid twice under two different budgets for delivering the same environmental benefit. Mr Paterson made clear that he shares the European Parliament’s strong opposition to this policy.

Despite significant pressure from some Member States to extend sugar beet quotas to 2020, the UK, working with allies, persuaded the Council to agree that they will end in 2017.

Owen Paterson made his feelings clear:

“Sugar beet quotas are bad for business and bad for consumers. They are driving up the wholesale price of sugar by 35% and adding one per cent to hard pressed families’ food bills. I’m disappointed that they will continue beyond the date previously set for them to end but we have achieved a compromise and fought off calls for the end to be in 2020.

“Britain’s cake, biscuit and confectionary industries support thousands of jobs and turn over billions of pounds each year. The boom in global demand for western-style foods is creating huge opportunities for growth in this sector which we should not hold back. I’m glad that sugar beet quotas will finally be scrapped and I’m determined to work with the Commission to ensure fair treatment for cane sugar refiners.”

The EU Council concluded that coupled payments, the proportion of CAP subsidies linked to production, should increase. Under today’s proposals, Member States, including the UK, which have made the most progress in decoupling payments, will be allowed to pay up to seven percent of their direct payment budget as coupled payments. The remaining Member States will be allowed up to twelve per cent.

Environment Secretary, Owen Paterson added:

“The UK and our allies are clear that coupled payments are part of the past. It’s disappointing that the Council proposed they continue, but today`s agreement is still a clear improvement on the European Parliament’s proposal for 15% or even 18%. We continue to fight for a common low rate.”

Mr Paterson successfully fought off pressure from some Member States to see extended use of market intervention. Reducing market intervention has helped to keep Europe on the path towards a more competitive farming sector, rather than one subsidised by taxpayers.

Owen Paterson went on to say:

“I’m pressing for further progress towards an open market that makes farmers less dependent on subsidies.”

Earlier this week, Mr Paterson called on the European Commission to ensure that any decision on neonicotinoids is taken in light of field studies into their effects on bee populations. Today, eleven member states supported Mr Paterson’s call for the Commission to use all the latest scientific evidence.

Environment Secretary, Owen Paterson concluded:

“I am determined to do what’s right for bees. We should not be rushed into taking the wrong decision based on inconclusive evidence from laboratory tests. Our decision must be based on real bee activity in real fields. The results of our field trials are now being peer reviewed and I have promised to make them available to all member states and the Commission in the next two weeks.”

Defra News

Is the UK’s energy policy in crisis?

Recent announcements that the UK is facing a possible 10% drop in domestic energy output has compounded earlier reports that the government policy on supporting the UK’s energy infrastructure is falling short of expectations. The result, according to industry experts EDW, is a potential crisis not just in energy supply, but in consumer confidence as well.

“The last thing that anyone wanted to hear was that their already-record high energy bills are going to keep on going up while supplies could potentially become unreliable at best,” comments Graham Paul, Service Delivery Director of EDW Technology Limited. “The fact that the government’s lack of delivering investment in what is an essential utility for every single person in the country could mean that we face an uncertain future peppered with power outages merely compounds the problem,” he adds.

It is estimated that £110billion of investment in the next 10 years is needed if the UK is to meet the future demand for energy. The fact that four coal-powered stations have gone off line early hasn’t helped matters, and has in fact made the need for investment all the more urgent.

Please sir, can I have some more?

It’s not just the industry watchers who realise that things are reaching a critical point – the suppliers are well aware of the fact that we’re facing a tipping point as far as energy infrastructure versus supply is concerned. They’re not afraid to go straight to the government in a modern version of Oliver Twist and ask, bowl in hand, for ‘some more investment’ either.

EDF, one of the biggest energy suppliers in the UK, has recently asked the Treasury to provide a UK Guarantee to ensure that the costs of the proposed redevelopment of the Hinkley Point C nuclear power project. The FT reported that talks were at an early stage and that the outcome would depend on a strike price being agreed from the outset.

Foreign investment scaled back

Meanwhile, Centrica have already said that they are to withdraw from any new UK nuclear projects. The announcement by German energy giant RWE that it would ‘significantly scale back’ investment in the UK unless the government displayed a marked improvement in the clarity of its energy policy makes industry watchers wonder whether this could be one of the biggest political crises the coalition government could face. “Energy costs are really becoming a major concern for consumers, with around 10% of UK households now classified as living in ‘fuel poverty’, comments Graham Paul of EDW. “The lack of a clear energy policy and the utter confusion surrounding the future of the UK’s energy supply could potentially be a fatal blow to this government’s stability. Without a sound energy policy we risk isolation from our energy partners in Europe, as has already been demonstrated by the withdrawal of Centrica and the announcement from RWE. But if the lights start going out on a regular basis then the government could be faced with a real political crisis, as they suddenly realise that energy consumers are also voters,” he adds.

“The bottom line is that we’re at a crossroads when it comes to the UK’s energy policies and if we want to develop a sustainable and cost-efficient energy supply for the future then we have to act now,” he concludes.

ENDS

Notes for Editors:

About EDW:

EDW have a long history in developing, implementing and supporting best-of-breed software solutions for retail electricity quoting and customer management including their bespoke electricity pricing system – (Quote Lab) for the industrial and commercial market sector.

For PR enquiries please contact:

Graham Paul
Services Delivery Director
EDW Technology Limited

Phone: 08448 802 489
Direct Line: 01908 359745
Custom Release Wire

The science of science and innovation policy

Nearly £5 billion of public funding is spent on science and innovation in the UK each year. Despite cuts in other sectors, this level of funding was frozen in the 2010 Spending Review, guaranteeing “flat cash” until 2014. Another one-year Spending Review is due next year, but in the current economic climate, significant changes in spending are unlikely. For science to receive the funding it requires and deserves, its value and impact needs to be evidenced and clearly presented to decision-makers. As highlighted by James Wilsdon, Professor of Science and Democracy at Science and Technology Policy Research Unit (SPRU), at the Policy Lunchbox network, however, more work is needed to strengthen the evidence base for UK science and innovation policy.

James began his talk by comparing the situation in the UK to that of the United States. Across the Atlantic, there have been sustained investments in evaluating science and innovation policies over recent years. This was partly in response to an influential 2005 speech made by John Marburger, then science adviser to George W. Bush, where he said that the “science of science policy needs to grow up.” A ‘Science of Science and Innovation Policy’ programme was initiated in 2006, and has since funded upwards of ninety projects to develop and improve science policy decision-making in the US.

There is no equivalently well-developed programme in the UK. Many organisations, such as the Royal Society, Nesta, the Research Councils, and the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills, as well as university centres work on aspects of science and innovation policy, but much of this work is domain-specific (on genomics, energy etc.) and there is relatively little independent, system-wide analysis. Also there isn’t enough effort to compare the strengths and weaknesses of the UK system to other national systems, in both developed and emerging economies.

James highlighted that the relatively small amount of academic research carried out in the UK’s science and innovation system can result in policymakers relying very heavily on the few resources that are available. For example, in the lead up to the 2010 Spending Review, Professor Jonathan Haskel’s work on the contribution of science to economic growth was used extensively to defend the core science budget. This was a valuable addition to the arsenal of those fighting for science, but as we look ahead to the next General Election and beyond, we ideally need to broaden and deepen our evidence base.

Funding of science and innovation is relatively secure for the short-term, but more work is required to ensure this continues into the future. Currently, science funding is generally a non-partisan issue, with all political parties taking a similar line. Discussion at the Lunchbox led to the conclusion that in order to both reach a wider audience and for funding budgets to be increased, this consensus might need to change, such that science becomes an issue of more visible public and political debate.

Further research into the science and innovation systems of both the UK and other countries is needed to provide robust evidence for policy and decision-makers with regards to funding allocation and science policy. At a time when government budgets are under huge pressure, greater emphasis on the ’science of science policy’ within the UK would be timely and valuable.

Policy Lunchbox is a joint initiative between the British Ecological Society and the Biochemical Society. The next Lunchbox will be in April. For more information and past speakers, see the website.

Tags: , , , ,

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

BES Ecology & Policy Blog

Hogan publishes Heads of a Climate Action and Low-Carbon Development Bill and NESC Secretariat Climate Policy Analysis



Hogan publishes Heads of a Climate Action and Low-Carbon Development Bill
and NESC Secretariat Climate Policy Analysis

26/02/13

Legislation and Policy Analysis combined reflect a strongly progressive national position on climate change; will underpin achievement of Ireland’s EU and international targets

Following Government approval, the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government, Mr. Phil Hogan, T.D., today (26  February 2013) released outline Heads of a Climate Action and Low-Carbon Development Bill 2013 for consideration by the Oireachtas Joint Committee on the Environment, Culture and the Gaeltacht, and stakeholders.  The Minister also released the final climate policy analysis report from the Secretariat to the National Economic and Social Council: Ireland and the Climate Change Challenge: Connecting ‘How Much’ with ‘How To’, which articulates a “carbon neutral” vision for Ireland by 2050.

“Release of these documents today represents a further, hugely significant milestone in the Government’s 2-year Programme for the development of national climate policy and legislation issued in January 2012”, the Minister said.   While the outline Heads are a little later than promised in the Programme, Minister Hogan emphasised that “the absolute priority for Government was to ensure that we got the overall balance of the proposed provisions right having regard to the views of all stakeholders, and critical national considerations from both an environmental and an economic perspective.  When we published our 2-year programme early last year, we laid out a framework under which this Government would deliver more on addressing climate change than any of our predecessors, a framework which places Ireland among the leading countries, not just within the EU but at a wider international level, in seeking to balance the challenges and objectives of a low carbon future, and deliver on both environmental and economic grounds.  I am delighted today to be in a position to mark the latest significant step in delivering on that ambition”, the Minister said.

In releasing the outline Heads, Minister Hogan said that the planned Bill would be a first step in enacting “a critically important piece of national legislation in terms of the environmental and economic sustainability of our long-term future.  The outline Heads reflect a strongly progressive approach, particularly Heads 4 and 5 which places a statutory obligation on Government to adopt and implement plans that enable the State to transition to a low carbon, climate resilient and environmentally sustainable economy in the period to 2050.  A fundamental requirement to be taken into account in the plans to be prepared on foot of Heads 4 and 5, is the need for such plans to provide a basis for achieving Ireland’s binding mitigation targets and obligations at EU and international levels”.

On the issue of greenhouse gas emission reduction targets, Minister Hogan said he wished to put the record straight on this critical issue.  “Ireland already has a challenging greenhouse gas mitigation target for 2020, which is binding under EU law.  Compliance with that target is not an option; it is absolutely paramount and any ambition we set at a national level must, and will, respect compliance with this fundamental mitigation commitment and future increases in ambition” he said.  As indicated in the Heads released today, the legislation being developed by Government will be unequivocal on compliance with existing and future obligations of the State under EU law and any international agreement to which the State becomes a party.  Ireland has consistently and constructively supported EU leadership in seeking to mobilise an effective global response to climate change, and Minister Hogan said that a key objective for him in initiating the policy and legislation development process was “to ensure that we maintain our place among the progressive Member States within the EU and progressive Parties under the UN Convention on climate change”.

In accordance with the policy development Programme, the outline Heads of the Bill and the final climate policy analysis report from the NESC Secretariat have been sent today to the Chair of the Oireachtas Joint Committee.  It is expected that the Joint Committee will consider the outline Heads in conjunction with the interim and final climate policy analysis from the NESC Secretariat, consulting with stakeholders and submit a report to Government by mid 2013.

Minister Hogan reiterated the central role he foresees for the Joint Committee in this critical phase of policy and legislation development.  “I attach particular priority” the Minister emphasised “to the critical issue of coming to a clear national understanding of ‘how’ we will meet our binding EU and wider-international mitigation targets/commitments, in parallel with pursuing national objectives in a low-carbon global economy.  From the outset of the policy development Programme, I have been completely open about the fact that there are no easy answers to the greenhouse gas mitigation challenge we face in the immediate and longer term.  My intention is to ensure that the ultimate decisions on the way forward will be taken on the basis of a fair hearing for all stakeholders, and will provide a platform for a strong stakeholder and wider-society consensus on the fundamental objective of becoming a low carbon, climate resilient society with a competitive low-carbon economy over the period to 2050.”.

Thanking the NESC Secretariat for their analysis, Minister Hogan described the final report “as an impressive and inspiring piece of analytical work on the longer-term agenda to 2050 which merits careful and full consideration by all stakeholders before any final conclusions are drawn on a national policy position and the primary legislation needed to support it.  The analysis presents a highly ambitious but appropriate and realistic framework within which a more detailed climate policy agenda can be taken forward.  Carbon neutrality at a national level is a challenging concept that provides a powerful focus for policy development in response to the transition agenda.  It will require further definitional elaboration as part of the policy development process, but a strong national objective is key to progressive national policy”. 

In terms of next steps, Minister Hogan said that he looks forward to the constructive input of all stakeholders to the debate on national policy and legislation which will be facilitated by the Oireachtas Joint Committee in response to the outline Heads of the Bill and the policy analysis undertaken by the NESC Secretariat.  He welcomed the indication from the Joint Committee that it is keen to hear from interested parties who wish to contribute to the debate on the issue of formulating climate legislation.  The Joint Committee’s report, and the policy analysis by the NESC Secretariat, will be key inputs for consideration by Government in adopting a national policy position on the transition to a low-carbon future, and finalising the introduction of climate legislation in the second half of 2013.

END
 

Back


Environ.ie News Feed

350.org: Canadian and US Scientists and Policy Experts Call Canada’s Climate Bluff; Politicians Misleadingly Tout Canada’s Climate Regulations for Political Gain

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA–(Marketwire – Feb. 22, 2013) -

**Press Call Monday at 1:00pm EST**
Number: 866.952.7525, Passcode: CLIMATE
International dialers: 785.424.1830

Though Canadian politicians are touting their climate record (http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/02/17/keystone-xl-protest-washington-dc.html) as a way to inoculate against attacks that Keystone XL is “game over” for climate, this political rhetoric could not be further from the truth. Climate scientists in Canada and the US are expressing concern about Canada’s lack of climate progress and its attempt to look environmentally progressive as a way to secure Keystone approval.

Canadian and US climate scientists will host a press call on Monday, February 25 at 1:00pm EST to address Canadian politicians’ misleading rhetoric and express their concerns that Canada’s much-touted oil and gas regulations will fail to do anything meaningful on climate change given the federally-allowed expansion of tar sands development and the long history of broken promises on climate action.

WHO: Dr. John Abraham, University of St. Thomas School of Engineering
Dr. John Stone, adjunct Professor at Carleton University
Dr. Daniel Harvey, Department of Geography, University of Toronto
Mark Jaccard, professor of environmental economics at Simon Fraser University
Tzeporah Berman, BA, MES, Author and Canadian environmentalist
Bill McKibben, 350.org (http://350.org/) Founder
WHAT: Scientist press call about Canada’s failing climate policy
WHEN: Monday, February 25 at 1:00pm EST
HOW: Number: 866.952.7525, Passcode: CLIMATE
International dialers: 785.424.1830

Marketwire – Environment

Common Fisheries Policy reform marks a sea change

6 February 2013

Commenting on today’s (Wednesday 6 February) historic vote by European MEPs to reform the discredited European Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), Friends of the Earth’s Nature Campaigner Paul De Zylva said:

“This marks a sea change in fishing policy that will help safeguard shrinking stocks.

“But despite the fact some politicians still deny there’s a problem, more must be done to reduce the number of fish being taken from our seas.

“If we expect fish to be on our plates, we must end practices that empty our seas, harm the environment and do nothing to secure long term livelihoods for fishing crews and communities.”

ENDS

If you’re a journalist looking for press information please contact the Friends of the Earth media team on 020 7566 1649.

Published by Friends of the Earth Trust

Press releases by RSS